Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:06:50.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Logical Necessity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Stuart Hampshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It may sometimes be useful in philosophy to state a method of argument in very simple and even over-simplified terms; it may at a certain stage be useful to ignore for the moment the details and difficulties of particular philosophical arguments, and to try to state simply what is commonly assumed in a variety of different and even opposing arguments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 23 , Issue 87 , October 1948 , pp. 332 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 335 note 1 It may not be, probably is not, the mathematician's motive. I suppose that a pure mathematician is ordinarily interested in logical relations for their own sake.

page 339 note 1 Heidegger and the Existentialists are typical examples.

page 341 note 1 It is bad (logical) grammar to speak of a rule as being true or false. What is true or false is the statement that it is a rule.

page 344 note 1 A contradiction arises when rules conflict; rules conflict when one rule suggests that you may say p, another that you cannot say p. A third rule is then required to delimit the application of the other two.