Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:52:40.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What, if Anything, Is an Evolutionary Novelty?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Massimo Pigliucci
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea of phenotypic novelty appears throughout the evolutionary literature. Novelties have been defined so broadly as to make the term meaningless and so narrowly as to apply only to a limited number of spectacular structures. Here I examine some of the available definitions of phenotypic novelty and argue that the modern synthesis is ill equipped at explaining novelties. I then discuss three frameworks that may help biologists get a better insight of how novelties arise during evolution but warn that these frameworks should be considered in addition to, and not as potential substitutes of, the modern synthesis.

Type
Evolutionary Innovation and Novelties
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 75 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Cristina Bicchieri and Jason Alexander , December 2008 , pp. 887 - 898
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to Jonathan Kaplan for organizing a PSA symposium on evolutionary novelties, as well as to Jonathan, Alan Love, and Alirio Rosales for critical readings of the manuscript. The National Science Foundation (grant IOB-0450240) supported the development of these ideas.

References

Albert, V. A., Oppenheimer, D. G., and Lindqvist, C. (2002), “Pleiotropy, Redundancy and the Evolution of Flowers”, Pleiotropy, Redundancy and the Evolution of Flowers 7:297–301.Google ScholarPubMed
Arthur, W. (2000), “Intraspecific Variation in Developmental Characters: The Origin of Evolutionary Novelties”, Intraspecific Variation in Developmental Characters: The Origin of Evolutionary Novelties 40:811–818.Google Scholar
Bak, P., and Chen, K. (1991), “Self-Organized Criticality”, Scientific American (January): 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beldade, P., and Brakefield, P. M. (2002), “The Genetics and Evo-Devo of Butterfly Wing Patterns”, The Genetics and Evo-Devo of Butterfly Wing Patterns 3:442–452.Google ScholarPubMed
Brazeau, M. D., and Ahlberg, P. E. (2006), “Tetrapod-like Middle Ear Architecture in a Devonian Fish”, Tetrapod-like Middle Ear Architecture in a Devonian Fish 439 (7074): 318–321..Google Scholar
Cebra-Thomas, J., Tan, F., Sistla, S., Estes, E., Bender, G., Kim, C., Riccio, P., and Gilbert, S. F. (2005), “How the Turtle Forms Its Shell: A Paracrine Hypothesis of Carapace Formation”, How the Turtle Forms Its Shell: A Paracrine Hypothesis of Carapace Formation 304B:558–569.Google Scholar
Emlen, S. T. (1994), “Benefits, Constraints and the Evolution of the Family”, Benefits, Constraints and the Evolution of the Family 9:282–284.Google ScholarPubMed
Fernald, R. D. (2006), “Casting a Genetic Light on the Evolution of Eyes”, Casting a Genetic Light on the Evolution of Eyes 313:1914–1918.Google ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S. (1999), “A Dynamical Theory of Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes”, A Dynamical Theory of Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes 154:1–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldschmidt, R. (1940), The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (2002), The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E., and Lamb, M. J. (2005), Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, F. (1977), “Evolution and Tinkering”, Evolution and Tinkering 196:1161–1166.Google ScholarPubMed
Kothbauerhellmann, R. (1990), “On the Origin of a Tradition—Milk Bottle Opening by Titmice (Aves, Paridae)”, On the Origin of a Tradition—Milk Bottle Opening by Titmice (Aves, Paridae) 225 (5–6): 353–361.Google Scholar
Lemons, D., and McGinnis, W. (2006), “Genomic Evolution of Hox Gene Clusters”, Genomic Evolution of Hox Gene Clusters 313:1918–1922.Google ScholarPubMed
Love, A. C. (2003), “Evolutionary Morphology, Innovation, and the Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology”, Evolutionary Morphology, Innovation, and the Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology 18:309–345.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963), Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E., and Provine, W. B. (1980), The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. (1993), “Phylogenetic Relationships and Evolutionary Processes in East African Cichlid Fishes”, Phylogenetic Relationships and Evolutionary Processes in East African Cichlid Fishes 8:279–284.Google ScholarPubMed
Muller, G. B., and Newman, S. A. (2005), “The Innovation Triad: An EvoDevo Agenda”, The Innovation Triad: An EvoDevo Agenda 304B:487–503.Google Scholar
Muller, G. B., and Wagner, G. P. (1991), “Novelty in Evolution: Restructuring the Concept”, Novelty in Evolution: Restructuring the Concept 22:229–256.Google Scholar
Nitecki, M. H., ed. (1990), Evolutionary Innovations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, J. F., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W. (2003), Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, E. N. (2006), “Gene Regulatory Networks in the Evolution and Development of the Heart”, Gene Regulatory Networks in the Evolution and Development of the Heart 313:1922–1927.Google ScholarPubMed
Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., and Gray, R. D., eds. (2001), Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems Theory and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M. (2001), Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M. (2003), “Species as Family Resemblance Concepts: The (Dis-)Solution of the Species Problem?” BioEssays 25:596–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigliucci, M., and Kaplan, J. (2006), Making Sense of Evolution: Toward a Coherent Picture of Evolutionary Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigliucci, M., and Murren, C. (2003), “Genetic Assimilation and a Possible Evolutionary Paradox: Can Macroevolution Sometimes Be So Fast as to Pass Us By?”, Genetic Assimilation and a Possible Evolutionary Paradox: Can Macroevolution Sometimes Be So Fast as to Pass Us By? 57:1455–1464.Google Scholar
Platnick, N. I., and Rosen, D. E. (1987), “Popper and Evolutionary Novelties”, Popper and Evolutionary Novelties 9:5–16.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R., and Eccles, J. C. (1977), The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prum, R. O. (2005), “Evolution of the Morphological Innovations of Feathers”, Evolution of the Morphological Innovations of Feathers 304B:570–579.Google Scholar
Richmond, B. G., and Strait, D. S. (2000), “Evidence That Humans Evolved from a Knuckle-Walking Ancestor”, Evidence That Humans Evolved from a Knuckle-Walking Ancestor 404:382–385.Google ScholarPubMed
Salazar-Ciudad, I., and Jernvall, J. (2005), “Graduality and Innovation in the Evolution of Complex Phenotypes: Insights from Development”, Graduality and Innovation in the Evolution of Complex Phenotypes: Insights from Development 304B:619–631.Google Scholar
Salmon, A., Ainouche, M. L., and Wendel, J. F. (2005), “Genetic and Epigenetic Consequences of Recent Hybridization and Polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae)”, Genetic and Epigenetic Consequences of Recent Hybridization and Polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae) 14:1163–1175.Google Scholar
Schlichting, C. D., and Pigliucci, M. (1998), Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Sneppen, K., Bak, P., Flyvbjerg, H., and Jensen, M. H. (1995), “Evolution as a Self-Organized Critical Phenomenon”, Evolution as a Self-Organized Critical Phenomenon 92:5209–5213.Google ScholarPubMed
Sober, E. (1980), “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism”, Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism 47:350–383.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. L., and Ayala, F. J. (1981), “Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary?”, Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary? 213:967–971.Google ScholarPubMed
Thom, R. (1977), “Catastrophe Theory”, Catastrophe Theory 270 (5639): 658.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. ([1917] 1942), On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toquenaga, Y., and Wade, M. J. (1996), “Sewall Wright Meets Artificial Life: The Origin and Maintenance of Evolutionary Novelty”, Sewall Wright Meets Artificial Life: The Origin and Maintenance of Evolutionary Novelty 11:478–482.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1979), “A Catastrophe Theory of Evolution”, A Catastrophe Theory of Evolution 231:32–42.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. P., Amemiya, C., and Ruddle, F. (2003), “Hox Cluster Duplications and the Opportunity for Evolutionary Novelties”, Hox Cluster Duplications and the Opportunity for Evolutionary Novelties 100:14606–14606.Google ScholarPubMed
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003), Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. ([1953] 1973), Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar