Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T22:26:17.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theories in Children and the Rest of Us

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Eric Schwitzgebel
Eric Schwitzgebel*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I offer an account of theories useful in addressing the question of whether children are young theoreticians whose development can be regarded as the product of theory change. I argue that to regard a set of propositions as a theory is to be committed to evaluating that set in terms of its explanatory power. If theory change is the substance of cognitive development, we should see patterns of affect and arousal consonant with the emergence and resolution of explanation-seeking curiosity. Affect has largely been ignored as a potential source of support or disconfirmation for the “theory theory” of development.

Type
Philosophical Issues in Cognitive Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 63 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers Sep., 1996. , 1996 , pp. S202 - S210
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Mathias Frisch, Alison Gopnik, Martin Jones, Kim Kempton, Lisa Lloyd, Tori McGeer, Maria Merritt, Bojana Mladenovic, John Searle, and Leo van Munching for useful criticism.

‡

Department of Philosophy, 314 Moses Hall, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.

References

Bromberger, S. (1962), “An Approach to Explanation”, in Butler, R. S. (ed.), Analytical Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 72–105.Google Scholar
Case, R. (1985), Intellectual Development. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980), Rules and Representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, John H., Green, F. L., and Flavell, E. R. (1986), “Development of Knowledge about the Appearance-Reality Distinction”, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 212, 51.Google Scholar
Giere, R. (1988), Explaining Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226292038.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1993). “The Psychology of Folk Psychology”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. and Meltzoff, A. (1996), Words, Thoughts, and Theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. M. (1986), “Folk Psychology as Simulation,” Mind and Language 1:158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. (1948), “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”, Philosophy of Science 15: 567–579.10.1086/286983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1988), “The Child as Parent of the Scientist”, Mind and Language 3: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1994), “Pretending and Believing: Issues in the Theory of ToMM”, Cognition 50:211–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1986), Event Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perner, J. (1991), Understanding the Representational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952), Origins of Intelligence in Children. Trans. M. Cook. New York: Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1969), The Psychology of the Child. Trans. H. Weaver. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B. (1994), “Situated Rationalism”, in Hirschfeld, L. A. and Gelman, S. A. (eds.), Mapping the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 474–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1989), Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, S. and Singer, J. E. (1962), “Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State”, Psychological Review 69: 379–399.10.1037/h0046234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. (1977), Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., and Jacobson, K. (1992), “Origins of Knowledge”, Psychological Review 99: 605–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suppe, F. (1989), The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1989), Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (1990), The Child's Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar