Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:51:01.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Process of Discovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Andrew Lugg
Andrew Lugg*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main argument of this paper is that philosophical difficulties regarding scientific discovery arise mainly because philosophers base their arguments on a flawed picture of scientific research. Careful examination of N. R. Hanson's treatment of Kepler's discovery not only puts the rationality of this discovery beyond question, it also reveals what its rationality consists in. We can retrieve the point stressed by Hanson concerning the rational character of discoveries such as Kepler's even as we reject the type of “logical” analysis he proposes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 207 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

In writing this paper I have benefited from the comments of Lynne Cohen, Howard Duncan, and Thomas Nickles.

References

Dewey, J. (1930), Human Nature and Conduct, New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Dorling, J. (1973), “Demonstrative Induction: Its Significant Role in the History of Physics”, Philosophy of Science 40: 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975), Against Method. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Gingerich, O. (1971), “Kepler”, in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Gillispie, C. C. (ed.). Vol. VII. New York: Scribner, pp. 289–312.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1975), “Wilfred Sellars' Theory of Induction”, in Action, Knowledge and Reality, Castañeda, H. N. (ed.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 265–76.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1958), Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1961), “Is there a Logic of Scientific Discovery?” in Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, Fiegl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 20–35.Google Scholar
Kleiner, S. (1983), “A New Look at Kepler and Abductive Argument”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14: 279–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyré, A. (1973), The Astronomical Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lugg, A. M. (1978), “Overdetermined Problems in Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, N. (1974), “The Rationality of Scientific Discovery”, Philosophy of Science 41: 123–53, 247–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1973), Collected Works. vol. III. Robson, J. M. (ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Nickles, T. (1983), “Justification as Discoverability,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, vol. 6, pp. 157–60.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1960), Collected Papers. vol. V. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1965), Collected Papers. vol. I. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1938), Experience and Prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1973), Logic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Siegel, H. (1980), “Justification, Discovery and the Naturalizing of Epistemology”, Philosophy of Science 47: 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whewell, W. (1860), On the Philosophy of Discovery. Reprinted 1971. New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. (1972), “How did Kepler Discover his First Two Laws?” Scientific American 226: 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar