Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
The aim of this paper is to examine the usefulness of the Machamer, Darden, and Craver (2000) mechanism approach to gaining an understanding of explanation in cognitive neuroscience. We argue that although the mechanism approach can capture many aspects of explanation in cognitive neuroscience, it cannot capture everything. In particular, it cannot completely capture all aspects of the content and significance of mental representations or the evaluative features constitutive of psychopathology.
We would like thank Carl Craver for organizing the symposium session at which this paper was originally presented and Carl and Lindley Darden for useful discussion.