Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:35:45.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marc Ereshefsky, The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press (2001), 328 pp., $80.00 (cloth).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Matthew H. Haber
Matthew H. Haber*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , July 2005 , pp. 491 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benton, Michael J. (2000), “Stems, Nodes, Crown Clades, and Rank-Free Lists: Is Linnaeus Dead?”, Stems, Nodes, Crown Clades, and Rank-Free Lists: Is Linnaeus Dead? 75:633–648.Google ScholarPubMed
Dayrat, Benoit, Schander, Christoffer, and Angielczyk, Kenneth D. (2004), “Suggestions for a New Species Nomenclature”, Suggestions for a New Species Nomenclature 53:493–499.Google Scholar
Mishler, Brent D. (1999), “Getting Rid of Species?”, in Wilson, Robert (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 307–315.Google Scholar