Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:27:54.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

L. J. Cohen The implications of induction. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd., 1970. vii + 248 pp. np.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Alex C. Michalos*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Hilpinen, R. Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic (Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. XXII), Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1968.Google Scholar
[2] Hilpinen, R. and Hintikka, J.Rules of acceptance, indices of lawlikeness, and singular inductive inference: reply to a critical discussion.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 303307.10.1086/288366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Michalos, A. C. “An alleged condition of evidential support.” Mind 78 (1969): 440441.10.1093/mind/LXXVIII.311.440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Michalos, A. C.Hilpinen's rules of acceptance and inductive logic.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 293302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Michalos, A. C. The Popper–Carnap Controversy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Nagel, E. Principles of the Theory of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1939.Google Scholar