Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:28:39.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Quantum Physics, the Identity of Indiscernibles, and Some Unanswered Questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Paul Teller
Paul Teller*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy University of Illinois at Chicago Circle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 309 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnette, R. L. (1978), “Does Quantum Mechanics Disprove the Principle of The Identity of Indiscernibles?” Philosophy of Science 45: 466–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortes, A. (1976), “Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles: A False Principle”, Philosophy of Science 43: 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, A. (1981), “Quantum Theory and Identity of Indiscernibles Revisited”, Philosophy of Science 48: 487–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1976), “Survival and Identity” in A. Rorty (ed.). The Identity of Persons. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar