Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:26:52.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fashioning Descriptive Models in Biology: Of Worms and Wiring Diagrams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Rachel A. Ankeny
Rachel A. Ankeny*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, Carslaw F07, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The biological sciences have become increasingly reliant on so-called ‘model organisms’. I argue that in this domain, the concept of a descriptive model is essential for understanding scientific practice. Using a case study, I show how such a model was formulated in a preexplanatory context for subsequent use as a prototype from which explanations ultimately may be generated both within the immediate domain of the original model and in additional, related domains. To develop this concept of a descriptive model, I focus on use of the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans and the wiring diagrams that were developed as models of its neural structure. In addition, implications of the concept of a descriptive model, particularly its relevance for the data-phenomena distinction as well as its relation to long-standing debates on realism, are briefly examined.

Type
Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000 , 2000 , pp. S260 - S272
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

An earlier version of this paper appeared as a section of my dissertation (Ankeny 1997), and I am grateful to members of my committee, especially Jim Lennox, John Earman, and Ken Schaffner, for feedback. Attendees at talks given in 1998 at the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh, the Department of Philosophy at University of Notre Dame, and the Philosophy of Science Association Biennial Meeting also provided helpful comments. Finally, numerous scientists in the C. elegans community have been invaluable, particularly for their willingness to provide unpublished materials and participate in interviews. Research for this project was funded in part by a dissertation grant from the Science and Technology Studies Program of the National Science Foundation (NSF 9617211).

References

Anderson, Phillip, Emmons, Scott W., and Moerman, Donald G. (1992), “Discovery of Tc1 in the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans”, in Fedoroff, Nina and Botstein, David (eds.), The Dynamic Genome: Barbara McClintock's Ideas in the Century of Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 319–333.Google Scholar
Ankeny, Rachel (1997), The Conqueror Worm: An Historical and Philosophical Examination of the Use of the Nematode C. elegans as a Model Organism. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Aronson, Jerrold L., Harré, Rom, and Way, Eileen C. (1995), Realism Rescued: How Scientific Progress is Possible. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bargmann, Cornelia I. (1993), “Genetic and Cellular Analysis of Behavior in C. elegans”, Annual Review of the Neurosciences 16: 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beth, E. (1949), “Toward an Up-to-Date Philosophy of the Natural Sciences”, Methodos 1: 178–185.Google Scholar
Bogen, James and Woodward, James (1988), “Saving the Phenomena”, The Philosophical Review 47: 303–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolker, Jessica A. (1995), “Model Systems in Developmental Biology”, BioEssays 17: 451–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, James R. (1994), Smoke and Mirrors: How Science Reflects Reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
C. elegans Sequencing Consortium (1998), “Genome Sequence of the Nematode C. elegans: A Platform for Investigating Biology”, Science 282: 2012–2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Chadarevian, Soraya (1998), “Of Worms and Programmes: Caenorhabditis elegans and the Study of Development”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durbin, Paul T. (1988), “Model”, in Dictionary of Concepts in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Greenwood Press, 195–197.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. (1984), Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. (1988), Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom (1970), The Principles of Scientific Thinking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedgecock, Edward M. and Hall, David H. (1990), “Homologies in the Neurogenesis of Nematodes, Arthropods and Chordates”, Seminars in the Neurosciences 2: 159–172.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary B. (1963), Models and Analogies in Science. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary B. (1967), “Models and Analogy in Science”, in Edwards, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 5. New York: Macmillan, 354–359.Google Scholar
Leatherdale, William H. (1974), The Role of Analogy, Model, and Metaphor in Science. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Levins, Richard (1966), “The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology”, American Scientist 54: 421–431.Google Scholar
McAllister, James W. (1997), “Phenomena and Patterns in Data Sets”, Erkenntnis 47: 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennisi, Elizabeth (1998), “Worming Secrets From the C. elegans Genome”, Science 282: 1972–1974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raff, Rudolf A. (1996), The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L. (1990), “The Worm Project”, Science 248: 1310–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruvkun, Gary and Hobert, Oliver (1998), “The Taxonomy of Developmental Control in Caenorhabditis elegans”, Science 282: 2033–2041.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth F. (1986), “Exemplar Reasoning about Biological Models and Diseases: A Relation between the Philosophy of Medicine and Philosophy of Science”, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth F. (1993), Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth F. (1996), “Theory Structure and Knowledge Representation in Molecular Biology”, in Sarkar, Sahotra (ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidow, Arend and Thomas, W. Kelley (1994), “A Molecular Evolutionary Framework for Eukaryotic Model Organisms”, Current Biology 4: 596–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sulston, John E., Albertson, Donna G., and Thomson, J. Nichol (1980), “The Caenorhabditis elegans male: Postembryonic Developmkent of Nongonadal Structures”, Developmental Biology 78: 542–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suppe, Frederick (1977), The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick. (1989), The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Suppes, Patrick (1960), “A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences”, Synthese 12: 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Frederick. (1962), “Models of Data”, in Nagel, Ernest, Suppes, Patrick, and Tarski, Alfred (eds.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 252–261.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas C. (1970), “On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories”, Philosophy of Science 37: 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, Nicholas (1998), “Animal's Genetic Program Decoded, in a Science First”, New York Times 12/11/98, A1, A26.Google Scholar
White, John G., Southgate, Eileen, Thomson, J. Nichol, and Brenner, Sydney (1976), “The Structure of the Ventral Nerve Cord of Caenorhabditis elegans”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: B. Biological Sciences 275: 327–348.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (1989), “Data and Phenomena”, Synthese 79: 393–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar