Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T05:39:09.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homo Politicus and Argument (Nearly) All the Way Down: Persuasion in Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Neta C. Crawford
Neta C. Crawford
Affiliation:
Boston University. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much theorizing about world politics and many policy recommendations are predicated on a rather thin view of homo politicus, often assuming that humans are rational and self-interested strategic actors and that force is the ultima ratio of politics. This thin notion should be replaced by a richer understanding of homo politicus that includes the characteristic activities of political actors: we fight, we feel, we talk, and we build institutions. This understanding helps illuminate the scope and limits of strategic action, argument and persuasion in world politics in both empirical and normative senses. I describe the spectrum of political action that situates the role of argument and persuasion within the extremes of brute force on one side and mutual communication on the other. I also discuss barriers to argument and communication. Noting the role of argument in this spectrum of international and domestic political practice suggests that it is argument (nearly) all the way down and that the scope of argument can be and in some cases has increased over the longue durée. Coercion, by itself, has a limited role in world politics. The claim that there are distinctive logics of argumentation, strategic action, or appropriateness misses the point. Argument is the glue of politics—its characteristic practice. Understanding politics as argumentation has radical empirical and normative implications for the study and practice of politics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 103 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emmanuel, and Barnett, Michael. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1980. The Nichomachean Ethics, trans. David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1990. Politics, trans. H. Rackam. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1991. The Art of Rhetoric, trans. with an Introduction by Hugh Lawson-Tancred. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bethel, Leslie. 1966. The mixed commissions for the suppression of the transatlantic slave trade in the nineteenth century. Journal of African History 7 (1): 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James. 2007. Democracy across Borders: From Demos to Demoi. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, E.H. 1946. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939. 2d ed.London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2002. “Persuasion in International Institutions.” Presented at the Arguing and Persuasion In International Relations and European Affairs Workshop, European University Institute, Florence, April 8–10.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl von. 1976. On War, ed. Howard, and trans. Michael and Paret, Peter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemetson, Lynette. 2002. “How Children Experience War and Its Consequences.” New York Times, December 7, A27.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2000. The passion of world politics: Propositions on emotion and emotional relationships. International Security 24 (4): 116–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2008. “Human Nature and World Politics: Ecce Hayward Alker's Homo Politicus as Homo Humanitatis.” Presented at the conference Uncovering the Ethical: Recovering Meaning in International Relations Scholarship In Memory of Hayward Alker, Brown University, June 6–7.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2009. Human nature and world politics: Rethinking “Man.” International Relations (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, Philip D. 1969. The Atlantic Slave Trade: A Census. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. 2001. Conversation across boundaries: Political theory and global diversity. Millenium: Journal of International Studies 30 (2): 331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Karl, Burrel, Sidney, Lee, Robert A. Kann Maurice Jr., Lichterman, Martin, Lindgren, Raymond, Lowenthal, Francis, and Van Wagenen, Richard W.. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dietelhoff, Nicole, and Müller, Harald. 2005. Theoretical paradise—empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas. Review of International Studies 31 (1): 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forsberg, Randall Caroline Watson. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Peace: The Role of Moral Beliefs.” PhD diss. Political Science, MIT.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1983. The subject and power. In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, ed. Dreyus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Colin, Gordon and Miller, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gearhart, Sally Miller. 1979. The womanization of rhetoric. Women's Studies International Quarterly 2: 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990a. Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990b. Moral consciousness and communicative action. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. A genealogical analysis of the cognitive content of morality. In The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1986 [1651] Leviathan. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Adam. 2005. Bury the Chains: Profits and Rebels In the Fight to Free an Empire's Slaves. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Holmes, Robert. 1989. On War and Morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2005. Speaking and hearing: Habermasian discourse ethics, feminism, and IR. Review of International Studies 31 (1): 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iklé, Fred Charles. 1999. The role of emotions in international negotiations. In International Negotiation: Actors, Structure/Process, Values, ed. Berton, Peter, Kimura, Hiroshi, and Zartman, I. William. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., ed. 1986a. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986b. Realism, neorealism and the study of world politics. In Keohane, ed., Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielstra, Paul Michael. 2000. The Politics of Slave Trade Suppression in Britain and France, 1814–48: Diplomacy, Morality and Economics. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack, and Johnson, James. 1994. Aggregation and deliberation: On the possibility of democratic legitimacy. Political Theory 22 (2): 277–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVeen, E. Phillip. 1977. British Slave Trade Suppression Policies, 1821–1865. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1998. Entre Nous: Thinking of the Other. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Christopher. 1949. The Navy and the Slave Trade. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lynch, Marc. 2002. Why engage? China and the logic of communicative engagement, European Journal of International Relations 8 (2): 187–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1996. Using power/fighting power: The Polity. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 6th ed., rev. by Thompson, Kenneth. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Morrow, Glenn R. 1953. Plato's conception of persuasion. The Philosophical Review 62 (2): 234–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Harald 2001. International relations as communicative action. In Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation, ed. Fierke, Karin M. and Joergensen, Knud Erik. London: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2002. The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go it Alone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind. In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Barry. 1999. Honor, Symbols, and War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Rodger A., and Samhat, Nayef H. 2004. Democratizing Global Politics: Discourse Norms, International Regimes, and Political Community. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!” Communicative action in world politics. International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1994. Ideas do not float freely: Transnational coalitions, domestic structures and the end of the Cold War. International Organization 48 (2): 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schulze, Hagan. 1998. Germany: A New History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Hugh. 1997. The Slave Trade: The Story of the Atlantic Slave Trade: 1440–1870. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Thucydides. 1954. History of the Peloponnesian War. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 1992. The Place of Emotion in Argument. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986. Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A response to my critics. In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Keohane, Robert O.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wiser, James L. 1977. Reason and the role of persuasion. Journal of Politics 39 (2): 427–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar