Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:06:51.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“It is the ‘starting over’ part that is so hard”: Using an online group to support hospice bereavement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2014

Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles ,
Karla Washington ,
Debra Parker Oliver ,
Sara Shaunfield ,
L. Ashley Gage ,
Megan Mooney  and
Alexandria Lewis
Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles*
Affiliation:
Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
Karla Washington
Affiliation:
Curtis W. and Ann H. Long Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Debra Parker Oliver
Affiliation:
Curtis W. and Ann H. Long Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Sara Shaunfield
Affiliation:
Department of Communication, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
L. Ashley Gage
Affiliation:
Curtis W. and Ann H. Long Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Megan Mooney
Affiliation:
Curtis W. and Ann H. Long Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Alexandria Lewis
Affiliation:
Curtis W. and Ann H. Long Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles, Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Although hospice agencies are required to provide informal caregivers (family or friends of the patient) with formal bereavement support when their loved one passes, most bereavement interventions lack standardization and remain untested. We employed the Dual Processing Model of Bereavement as a theoretical framework for assessing the potential of a secret Facebook group for bereaved hospice caregivers.

Method:

A mixed-methods approach was utilized to analyze online communication (posts and comments) in the secret Facebook group, and self-reported outcome measures on depression and anxiety were compared pre- and post-intervention.

Results:

Sixteen caregivers participated in the secret Facebook group over a period of nine months. The majority of online talk was oriented to restoration, revealing abrupt and anticipated triggers that evoked feelings of loss. Caregivers also shared loss orientation through storytelling, sharing and giving advice, and encouraging others to manage the challenges of coping. Caregiver anxiety and depression were lower after the intervention.

Significance of Results:

This pilot study provides insight into the use of a secret Facebook group to facilitate bereavement support to caregivers. Findings highlight the promise of Facebook for hospice bereavement support. Providers and researchers are encouraged to explore the positive outcomes associated with bereavement support.

Keywords

InternetBereavementCaregiversHospice
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 351 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barry, C.L., Carlson, M.D., Thompson, J.W., et al. (2012). Caring for grieving family members: Results from a national hospice survey. Medical Care, 50(7), 578–584.Google Scholar
Bender, J.L., Jimenez-Marroquin, M.C. & Jadad, A.R. (2011). Seeking support on Facebook: A content analysis of breast cancer groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(1), e16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, K.M., Gibbons, K. & Mackenzie-Smith, S. (2010). Loss and restoration in later life: An examination of dual process model of coping with bereavement. Omega (Westport), 61(4), 315–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buis, L.R. (2008). Emotional and informational support messages in an online hospice support community. Computers, Informatics Nursing, 26(6), 358–367.Google Scholar
Carr, D. (2010). New perspectives on the Dual Process Model (DPM): What have we learned? What questions remain? Omega (Westport), 61(4), 371–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2008). 42 CFR § 418, Medicare and Medicaid programs: Hospice conditions of participation. Available from http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/418.Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
de la Torre-Diez, I., Diaz-Pernas, F.J. & Anton-Rodriguez, M. (2012). A content analysis of chronic diseases social groups on Facebook and Twitter. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 18(6), 404–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, H., Llewelyn, S., Relf, M., et al. (2012). Helpful aspects of bereavement support for adults following an expected death: Volunteers' and bereaved people's perspectives. Death Studies, 36(6), 541–564.Google Scholar
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R.L. & Williams, J.B.W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, B., Decker, O., Muller, S., et al. (2008). Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical Care, 46(3), 266–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (2012). NHPCO facts and figures: Hospice care in America. Available from http://www.nhpco.org.Google Scholar
Schut, H. & Stroebe, M.S. (2005). Interventions to enhance adaptation to bereavement, Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(Suppl. 1), S140–S147.Google Scholar
Shear, M.K. (2010). Exploring the role of experiential avoidance from the perspective of attachment theory and the dual process model. Omega (Westport), 61(4), 357–369.Google Scholar
Stroebe, M. & Schut, H. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23(3), 197–224.Google ScholarPubMed
Stroebe, M. & Schut, H. (2010). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: A decade on. Omega (Westport), 61(4), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Eijk, M., Faber, M., Aarts, J.W.M., et al. (2013). Using online health communities to deliver patient-centered care to people with chronic conditions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(6), e115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W. & Lane, B.S. (2013). Promoting neonatal staff nurses' comfort and involvement in end of life and bereavement care. Nursing Research and Practice, 2013, 365329. Available from http://www.hindawi.com/journals/nrp/2013/365329/.Google Scholar