Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T09:42:19.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Reception Study? A Proposal for Terminological Definitions Based on Christina Hoegen-Rohls’ Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2023

Régis Burnet Open the ORCID record for Régis Burnet [Opens in a new window]
Régis Burnet*
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherches Religions, Spiritualités, Cultures, Sociétés (RSCS), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A response to the article by Christina Hoegen-Rohls.

Keywords

Wirkungsgeschichteexegetical practicephilosophical contextreception history
Type
Short Study
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , July 2023 , pp. 271 - 276
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Balibar, Françoise, ‘Force/Energy’, in Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon (ed. Barbara Cassin; trans. Rendall, Steven et al.; Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014) 343–9Google Scholar.

2 Consciousness of being affected by history (wirkungsgeschichtliches Bewußtsein) is primarily consciousness of the hermeneutical situation. Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, 2nd ed. (trans. Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.; Continuum Impacts; London/New York: Continuum, 2004) 301Google Scholar; Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Hermeutik I: Wahrheit Und Methode, 7th ed. (Uni-Taschenbücher 2115; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999) 307Google Scholar.

3 Gadamer, Truth and Method, 301–7; Gadamer, WM, 308–10.

4 ‘It is just as absurd to fancy that a philosophy can transcend its contemporary world as it is to fancy that an individual can overleap his own age.’ Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Hegel's Philosophy of Right (trans. Knox, T. M.; Oxford: Oxford UP, 1952) 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Veith, Jerome, Gadamer and the Transmission of History (Studies in Continental Thought; Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2015) 3Google Scholar.

6 Luz, Ulrich, Matthew in History. Interpretation, Influence, and Effects (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1994), 34–8Google Scholar.

7 Gadamer, Hans Georg, ‘Begriffsgeschichte Als Philosophie’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 14 (1970) 137–51Google Scholar.

8 Imago Exegetica: Visual Images as Exegetical Instruments, 1400-1700, Intersections 33 (ed. Walter S. Melion, James Clifton, and Michel Weemans; Lovis Corinth Colloquium; Leiden: Brill, 2014). See also The Art of Visual Exegesis: Rhetoric, Texts, Images (Emory Studies in Early Christianity 19; ed. Vernon K. Robbins, Walter S. Melion, and Roy R. Jeal; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2017). The expression comes from Berdini, Paolo, The Religious Art of Jacopo Bassano: Painting as Visual Exegesis (Cambridge Studies in New Art History and Criticism; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

9 Espagne, Michel, ‘Bildung, Kultur, Zivilisation’, in Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon (ed. Cassin, Barbara; trans. Rendall, Steven et al.; Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014) 111–19Google Scholar.

10 Concerning these questions the essential book remains: Bourdieu, Pierre, La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement (Le Sens commun; Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1979)Google Scholar.

11 Grondin, Jean, The Philosophy of Gadamer (Continental European Philosophy; Chesham: Acumen, 2003) 85–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Gen 14.18–20; Ps 110.4; 11QMelch; He 5.6; 6.20; 7.17; Philo, Leg All. III 25–6 §§ 79–82; Josephus, Ant. 1.10.2 §180.