Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:01:52.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How can a seemingly weak state in the financial services industry act strong? The role of organizational policy capacity in monetary and macroprudential policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2019

Caner Bakır  and
Mehmet Kerem Çoban Open the ORCID record for Mehmet Kerem Çoban [Opens in a new window]
Caner Bakır
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations, College of Administrative Sciences and Economics, and GLODEM, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450, İstanbul; [email protected].
Mehmet Kerem Çoban
Affiliation:
GLODEM, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450, İstanbul; [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is widely held in the public policy and political economy literatures that the Turkish state is weak and cannot adopt a proactive approach in the financial services industry by steering and coordinating the financial policy network. However, it is puzzling that this seemingly “weak” Turkish state, which is often marked by fragmentation, conflict, and a lack of policy coordination within the state apparatus, acted strongly between 2010 and 2016 by taking pre-emptive measures to contain the macrofinancial risks arising from hot money inflows and bank credit expansion. Examining the organizational policy capacity of the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, this article argues that proactive policy design and implementation are more likely to complement state capacity when the principal bureaucratic actors have strong organizational policy capacities.

Keywords

Policy capacitystateTurkeyCentral Bankfinancial stability
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 61 , November 2019 , pp. 71 - 96
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Authors’ Note: We are very grateful to Sinan Akgünay for his comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this article. We thank the interviewed officials for their openness in their responses. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 25th IPSA World Congress of Political Science, held in Brisbane, Australia on July 21–25, 2018, and we thank panel participants for their constructive comments. We also very much appreciate the constructive comments of three anonymous referees and the editors of the journal. Mehmet Kerem Çoban would like to gratefully acknowledge the generous financial support of the Academic Support Fund of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.

References

Akcelik, Yasin, Ahmet Faruk, Aysan, and Oduncu, Arif. “Central Banking in Making during the Post-crisis World and the Policy-Mix of the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.” Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice 2, no. 2 (2013): 5–18.Google Scholar
Akyüz, Yilmaz and Boratav, Korkut. “The Making of the Turkish Financial Crisis.” World Development 31, no. 9 (2003): 1549–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Summers, Lawrence H.. “Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 25, no. 2 (1993): 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alper, Koray, Kara, Hakan, and Yörükoğlu, Mehmet. “Alternative Tools to Manage Capital Flow Volatility.” BIS Papers 73 (2013): 335–352.Google Scholar
Aysan, Ahmet Faruk, Fendoğlu, Salih, and Kilinc, Mustafa. “Macroprudential Policies as Buffer against Volatile Cross-border Capital Flows.” The Singapore Economic Review 60, no. 1 (2015): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andrew. “New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift.” New Political Economy 18, no. 1 (2013): 112–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andrew. The Political Economy and Paradoxes of Macroprudential Regulation.” SPERI Paper no. 40. Sheffield: Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute, 2017.Google Scholar
Bakir, Caner. “Governance by Supranational Interdependence: Domestic Policy Change in the Turkish Financial Services Industry.” In Emerging European Financial Markets: Independence and Integration Post-Enlargement. Edited by Batten, Jonathan and Kearney, Colm. London: Elsevier, 2006. 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner. Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası’nın 1930–2001 Arasında Siyasal ve Ekonomik Bağımsızlığı: Siyasal-Ekonomik Etkileşime İlişkin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çözümleme.” METU Studies in Development 33, no. 1 (2006): 1–31.Google Scholar
Bakir, Caner. Merkezdeki Banka ve Uluslararası Bir Karşılaştırma. İstanbul: Bilgi University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Bakir, Caner. “The Governance of Financial Regulatory Reform: The Australian Experience.” Public Administration 87, no. 4 (2009): 910–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner. “Policy Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change: Multi-level Governance of Central Banking Reform.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 22, no. 4 (2009): 571–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner. “Maliye Bürokrasisinde Örgütsel Değişim ve Vergi Denetim Kurulu Başkanlığının Kurulması.” Amme Idaresi Dergisi 45, no. 2 (2012): 81–102.Google Scholar
Bakir, Caner. Bank Behavior and Resilience: The Effects of Structures, Institutions and Agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner. “Bargaining with Multinationals: Why State Capacity Matters.” New Political Economy 20, no. 1 (2015): 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner. “Merkez Bankası Başkanları ve Siyasetçiler.” Kurumsal Yatirimci Dergisi (April–June, 2015): 56–57.Google Scholar
Bakir, Caner. “How Can Interactions among Interdependent Structures, Institutions, and Agents Inform Financial Stability? What We Have Still to Learn from Global Financial Crisis.” Policy Sciences 50, no. 2 (2017): 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner. “Actions, Contexts, Mechanisms and Outcomes in Macroprudential Policy Design and Implementation.” Public Policy and Administration (2019). doi: 10.1177/0952076719827057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner and Öniş, Ziya. “The Regulatory State and Turkish Banking Reforms in the Age of post-Washington Consensus.” Development and Change 41, no. 1 (2010): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner and Jarvis, Darryl S. L., “Contextualising the Context in Policy Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change.” Policy and Society 36, no. 4 (2017): 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner and Woo, J. J.. “Financial Sector Reform and Policy Design in an Age of Instability.” Policy and Society 35, no. 3 (2016): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, Caner and Coban, Mehmet Kerem. “Policy Analysis and Capacity in the Central Bank of Turkey.” In Policy Analysis in Turkey. Edited by Bakir, Caner and Ertan, Güneş. Bristol: Policy Press, 2018. 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Başçı, Erdem and Kara, Hakan. “Finansal Istikrar ve Para Politikası.” Working Paper no. 11/08. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, May 2011.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. “Process Tracing and Causal Inference.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Edited by Henry, E. Brady and Collier, David. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher, Inc., 2010. 207–219.Google Scholar
Coban, Mehmet Kerem. “Compliance Forces, Domestic Policy Process, and International Regulatory Standards: Compliance with Basel III.” Business and Politics (2019). doi: 10.1017/bap.2019.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, William D. Financial Services, Globalization and Domestic Policy Change. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, Mark. “Thinking Outside the Box? Applying Design Theory to Public Policy.” Politics & Policy 40, no. 4 (2012): 704–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, Christopher and Meade, Ellen E.. “Central Bank Independence and Transparency: Evolution and Effectiveness.” European Journal of Political Economy 24, no. 4 (2008): 763–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çetin, Tamer, Zahid Sobacı, M., and Nargeleçekenler, Mehmet. “Independence and Accountability of Independent Regulatory Agencies: The Case of Turkey.” European Journal of Law and Economics 41, no. 3 (2016): 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demiralp, Seda and Demiralp, Selva. “Erosion of Central Bank Independence in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 20, no. 1 (2019): 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter B. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Dietrich, Rueschemeyer, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flug, Kranit. “Policy Analysis at the Bank of Israel.” In Policy Analysis in Israel. Edited by Menahem, Gila and Zehavi, Amos. Bristol: Policy Press, 2016. 141–152.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Garcia-Escribano, Mercedes and Han, Fei. “Credit Expansion in Emerging Markets: Propeller of Growth?” IMF Working Papers no. 15/22. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2015.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Charles. “Liquidity Management.” Proceedings – Economic Policy Symposium – Jackson Hole. Kansas City, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 2009. 157–168. =https://www.kansascityfed.org/~/media/files/publicat/sympos/2009/papers/goodhart091109.pdf?la=en.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Charles and Lastra, Rosa. “Populism and Central Bank Independence.” Open Economies Review 29, no. 1 (2018): 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürkaynak, Refet S., Zeynep Kantur, M. Taş, Anıl, and Yıldırım, Seçil. “Monetary Policy in Turkey after Central Bank Independence.” Iktisat, Isletme ve Finans 30, no. 356 (2015): 9–38.Google Scholar
Head, Brian W. “Reconsidering Evidence-based Policy: Key Issues and Challenges.” Policy and Society 29, no. 2 (2010): 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hielscher, Kai and Markwardt, Gunther. “The Role of Political Institutions for the Effectiveness of Central Bank Independence.” Journal of European Political Economy 28, no. 3 (2012): 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, Roman and Vaško, Dan. “Central Bank Transparency and Financial Stability.” Journal of Financial Stability 22 (2016): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. “Policy Analytical Capacity and Evidence-based Policy-making: Lessons from Canada.” Canadian Public Administration / Administration Publique du Canada 52, no. 2 (2009): 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. “From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Policy Design: Design Thinking beyond Markets and Collaborative Governance.” Policy Sciences 47, no. 3 (2014): 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. “The Criteria for Effective Policy Design: Character and Context in Policy Instrument Choice.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 11, no. 3 (2018): 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M.. “Globalization and the Choice of Governing Instruments: The Direct, Indirect, and Opportunity Effects of Internationalization.” International Public Management Journal 9, no. 2 (2006): 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M.. “The Two Orders of Governance Failure: Design Mismatches and Policy Capacity Issues in Modern Governance.” Policy and Society 33, no. 4 (2014): 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M.. “Achilles’ Heels of Governance: Critical Capacity Deficits and Their Role in Governance Failures.” Governance 10, no. 4 (2016): 301–313.Google Scholar
Huitema, Dave, Jordan, Andrew, Munaretto, Stefania, and Hildén, Mikael. “Policy Experimentation: Core Concepts, Political Dynamics, Governance and Impacts.” Policy Sciences 51, no. 2 (2018): 143–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Recent Experiences in Managing Capital Flows: Cross-Cutting Themes and Possible Policy Framework. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2011. http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2011/021411a.pdf.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Increasing Resilience to Large and Volatile Capital Flows: The Role of Macroprudential Roles – Case Studies. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2017. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2017/09/13/pp062117increasing-resilience-macroprudential-policies-case-studies.Google Scholar
Kara, Hakan. “Monetary Policy in Turkey after the Global Crisis.” Working Paper no. 12/17. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, June 2012.Google Scholar
Kara, Hakan. “Turkey’s Experience with Macroprudential Policy.” BIS Papers 86 (2016): 123–139.Google Scholar
Kara, Hakan. “A Brief Assessment of Turkey’s Macroprudential Policy Approach: 2011–2015.” Central Bank Review 16, no. 3 (2016): 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kara, Hakan and Sarıkaya, Çağrı. “Türkiye’de Konjonktürel Etkilerden Arındırılmış Cari Işlemler Dengesi.” Working Paper no. 13/40. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, November 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klomp, Jeroen and de Haan, Jakob. “Inflation and Central Bank Independence: A Meta-regression Analysis.” Journal of Economic Surveys 24, no. 4 (2010): 593–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Politics of Advanced Industrial States. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Koç, Çağan and Ant, Onur. “Erdogan Ousts Central Bank Chief Who Drew Ire for Holding Rates.” Bloomberg (July 6, 2019). https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-06/erdogan-removes-cetinkaya-names-deputy-as-central-bank-governor.Google Scholar
Lodge, Martin and Wegrich, Kai, eds. The Problem-solving Capacity of the State: Governance Challenges and Administrative Capacities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. “Only Connect: Why Government Often Ignores Research.” Policy Sciences 48, no. 2 (2015): 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltsner, Arnold J. “Political Feasibility and Policy Analysis.” Public Administration Review 32, no. 6 (1972): 859–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Joshua. “Deconstructing the Debate over Evidence-based Policy.” Critical Policy Studies 11, no. 2 (2017): 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Joshua, Cherney, Adrian, and Head, Brian W.. “Policy Capacity and Evidence-based Policy in the Public Service.” Public Management Review 19, no. 2 (2017): 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliphant, Samuel and Howlett, Michael. “Assessing Policy Analytical Capacity: Comparative Insights from a Study of the Canadian Environmental Policy Advice System.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 12, no. 4 (2010): 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozel, Isik. “The Politics of De-delegation: Regulatory (In)dependence in Turkey.” Regulation & Governance 6, no. 1 (2012): 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, Martin and Pierre, Jon. “Unpacking Policy Capacity: Issues and Themes.” In Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives. Edited by Painter, Martin and Pierre, Jon. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaglia, Lucia. “Financial Regulation and Supervision in the European Union after the Crisis.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 16, no. 1 (2013): 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Carmen M. and Reinhart, Vincent. “Capital Flow Bonanzas: An Encompassing View of the Past and Present.” NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomist 5, no. 1 (2008): 9–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddell, Norman. Policy Research Capacity in the Federal Government. Ottawa: Policy Research Initiative, 2007.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In. Edited by Peter, B. Evans, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiemann, Matthias. “Is Resilience Enough? The Macro-Prudential Reform Agenda and the Lacking Smoothing of Cycle,” Public Administration 97, no. 3 (2019): 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası (TCMB). Financial Stability Report. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, December 2010.Google Scholar
Uysal, Murat. “Financial Stability and Macroprudential Policy in Turkey.” BIS Papers 94 (2017): 349–364.Google Scholar
Weiss, Linda. The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Wu, Xun, Ramesh, M., and Howlett, Michael. “Policy Capacity: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Policy Competences and Capabilities.” Policy and Society 35, no. 3–4 (2015): 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Xun, Howlett, Michael, and Ramesh, M.. “Policy Capacity: Conceptual Framework and Essential Components.” In Policy Capacity and Governance: Assessing Governmental Competences and Capabilities in Theory and Practice. Edited by Wu, Xun, Howlett, Michael, and Ramesh, M.. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yağcı, Mustafa. “Institutional Entrepreneurship and Organisational Learning: Financial Stability Policy Design in Turkey.” Policy and Society 36, no. 4 (2017): 539–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Robert. K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.Google Scholar
Zysman, John. Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar