Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:15:02.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can syllabification improve pronunciation by analogy of English?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2006

YANNICK MARCHAND
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiagnostics (Atlantic), National Research Council Canada, Neuroimaging Research Laboratory, 1796 Summer Street, Suite 3900 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3A7
ROBERT I. DAMPER
Affiliation:
Image, Speech and Intelligent Systems (ISIS) Research Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK email [email protected]

Abstract

In spite of difficulty in defining the syllable unequivocally, and controversy over its role in theories of spoken and written language processing, the syllable is a potentially useful unit in several practical tasks which arise in computational linguistics and speech technology. For instance, syllable structure might embody valuable information for building word models in automatic speech recognition, and concatenative speech synthesis might use syllables or demisyllables as basic units. In this paper, we first present an algorithm for determining syllable boundaries in the orthographic form of unknown words that works by analogical reasoning from a database or corpus of known syllabifications. We call this syllabification by analogy (SbA). It is similarly motivated to our existing pronunciation by analogy (PbA) which predicts pronunciations for unknown words (specified by their spellings) by inference from a dictionary of known word spellings and corresponding pronunciations. We show that including perfect (according to the corpus) syllable boundary information in the orthographic input can dramatically improve the performance of pronunciation by analogy of English words, but such information would not be available to a practical system. So we next investigate combining automatically-inferred syllabification and pronunciation in two different ways: the series model in which syllabification is followed sequentially by pronunciation generation; and the parallel model in which syllabification and pronunciation are simultaneously inferred. Unfortunately, neither improves performance over PbA without syllabification. Possible reasons for this failure are explored via an analysis of syllabification and pronunciation errors.

Type
Papers
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)