Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:16:58.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Peculiarities of Traditional Marriage Rituals of the Dungan Diaspora: A Comparative-Historical Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2019

Zulfiya Imyarova
Zulfiya Imyarova*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, Narxoz University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article, through comparative historical analysis, examines the traditional marriage rituals of the Dungan diaspora in Kazakhstan. Dungans are Chinese-speaking Muslims who were forced to migrate to present-day Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan after the defeat of their revolt against the Qing dynasty from 1877 to 1888. The article focuses on the diversity of wedding ceremonies in three zones where Dungan settled in Kazakhstan: Zhalpak Tobe and Sortobe, two rural areas in the Zhambyl region; and Zaria Vostok, near the city of Almaty. I find that the local variations in traditional wedding ceremonies stem from their close intercultural and social cooperation with non-Dungan peoples—primarily Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Uyghurs, and Russians. The example of wedding rituals shows that, while Dungan existence in another cultural environment has stimulated the consolidation of their ethnic group, preserving many of the traditional archaic cultural features, it has also led to the transformation of the marriage ceremonies. I address a much-neglected pathway—the nature of borrowed elements in Dungan wedding rituals—and ask why the extent of borrowing varies from community to community even though the Dungan arrived from China with similar traditions.

Keywords

Dungan diasporatraditional marriage ritualsMuslimsChina
Type
Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 492 - 505
Copyright
© Association for the Study of Nationalities 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agency on Statistics of Republic of Kazakhstan. 2017. “The Number of Population in Republic of Kazakhstan by Separate Ethnos at Beginning of 2017.” http://stat.gov.kz/faces/wcnav_externalId/homeNumbersPopulation; jsessionid=WRUbPepNS3fTMjKjOd6aQNPoHXhM32AP_GWge335Oseu36abdohV!1021093704!-398810081?_afrLoop=4511347792664561#%40%3F_afrLoop%3D4511347792664561%26_adf.ctrl-state%3D6no56j0aj_4. (Accessed February 11, 2019.)Google Scholar
Allès, Elisabeth. 2000. “The Dungans and the Marriage Ceremony. A Case of Multiple Identities.” China Perspectives 27 (January/February): 62–69.Google Scholar
Bakirov, Rashid. 2014. “Pod edinym shanyrakom: Dunganskaia svad’ba-drevnie traditsii v sovremenom voploschenie.” [Under a single shanyrak: Dungan wedding-ancient traditions in the modern embodiment]. July 4. https://www.inform. kz/rus/article/2674679. (Accessed February 11, 2019.)Google Scholar
Chan, Wing-tsit. 1953. Religious Trends in Modern China. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Davenel, Yves-Marie. 2012. “Cultural Mobilization in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan: Views from the State and from Non-titular Nationalities Compared.” Central Asian Survey 31 (1): 17–29.Google Scholar
Demko, George J. 1969. The Russian Colonization of Kazakhstan 1896–1916. Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 99. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dilmanov, Satybaldy. 2006. Ispravitelnye trudovye lageria na territorii Kazahstana (1930–1956) [Correctional labor camps on the territory of Kazakhstan (1930–1956)]. Almaty: n.p.Google Scholar
Dzhon, Ali, and Havaza, Fatima. 2016. “Izmeniniia v antroponimah dungan (huezu) kak marker identichnosti.” [Change in Dungan (Huitzu) anthroponymy as a marker of identity]. Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University, 63–70.Google Scholar
Dzhon, Ali. 2016. Obychai, obriady, pover’ia dungan. [Dungan customs, rituals and beliefs]. Bishkek: Ilim.Google Scholar
Ercilasun, Konuralp. 2017. “Soviet Agricultural Policy and Cultivating the ‘Virgin Lands’ in Kazakhstan. In Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. Life and Politics during the Soviet Era, edited by Timur Dadabayev and Hisao Komatsu, 53–65. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Fedorov, Dmitri. 1903. “Opyt voenno-statisticheskogo opisaniia Iliiskogo kraiia” [The experience of the military statistical description of the Ili region]. Turkestanskii voennyi okrug (3/6): 9–10.Google Scholar
Garin, Semen. 1952. “ Milianfan: dolina risa.” [Milianfan: Valley of rice]. Moscow: Pravda.Google Scholar
Hong, Ding. 2005. “A Comparative Study on the Cultures of the Dungan and the Hui Peoples.” Asian Ethnicity 6 (2): 135–140.Google Scholar
Imazov, Muhame. 2009. Dunganskaia entsiklopedia: vtoroe izdanie, ispravlennoe i dopolnenoe [Dungan Encyclopedia: Second edition, revised and expanded]. Bishkek: Ilim.Google Scholar
Tovar, Jiménez, Soledad, Anabel Alejandra. 2014. “A Centripetal Mirrors Cultural Conservation among Shaanxi Dungans in Kazakhstan.” PhD diss., University of Halle-Wiitenberg.Google Scholar
Krader, Lawrence. 1966. Peoples of Central Asia, 2nd. ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lillis, Joanna. 2010. “Astana Follows Thorny Path toward National Unity.” EurasiaNet. April 29. http://www.eurasianet.org/node/60952. (Accessed January 5, 2016.)Google Scholar
Nekrich, Aleksandr M. 1978. The Punished Peoples: The Deportation and Fate of Soviet Minorities at the End of the Second World War. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Poyarkov, Fedor. 1901. Poslednii epizod dunganskogo vostaniia [The last episode of the Dungan revolt]. Semirechen oblast: Vernyi.Google Scholar
Poyarkov, Fedor. 1903. “Svatovstvo u dungan (shemi)” [Matchmaking from the Dungan (Shemi)]. Ethnograficheskii obzor 2: 38–75.Google Scholar
Poiarkov, Fedor. 1908. Dungane (Svad’ba-Sifur) [Dungan (Weddings)]. Moscow: A. A. Levenson.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Renato. 1994. “Cultural Citizenship in San Jose, California.” PoLAR 17 (2): 57–64.Google Scholar
Rimsky-Korsakoff Dyer, Svetlana. 1978. “Soviet Dungan Weddings: Symbolism and Traditions.” Monumenta Serica 33: 363–378.Google Scholar
Savurov, Mane. 2007. Dunganskaia sem’ya: proshloe i nastoiaschee [Dungan family: Past and present]. Tashkent: n.p.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward A. D. 2000. “Framing Strategies and Non-conflict in Multi-ethnic Kazakhstan.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 6 (2): 71–94.Google Scholar
Selitskii, Ivan. 1904. “Kuldinkie pereselentsy pogranichnoi s Kitem polosy. Ekonomichesko-etnograficheskie ocherki i bytovaia zhizn’ iarkentskih taranchei i dungan” [Kulja migrants: Economic-ethnographic notes about the life of the Taranchin and Dungan]. In Dungane istoria i kultura—Vostochnaia literatura , edited by Olga Zav’ialova, 185–209, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Stratanovich, Grigori. 1949. Dunganskii narod Kirgizskoi SSR [Dungan people of Kirghiz SSR]. Frunze: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Stratanovich, Grigorii. 1954. Vopros o proishozhdenie dungan v Rossiiskoi i Sovetskoi literature [The question about Dungan origins in Russian and Soviet literature]. Moscow: Sovetskaia Etnografia 1.Google Scholar
Shinlo, Lodjar. 1959. Dunganskii ornament [Dungan ornament]. Frunze: Ilim.Google Scholar
Sushanlo, Muhamed. 1979. Sem’ya i semeinyi byt dungan [The Dungan family and their way of life]. Frunze: Ilim.Google Scholar
Tsibuzgin, Vladimir, and Shmakov, Andrei. 1909. Zametki o zhizni Dunganskih poselenii Karakunuza Pishpekskogo uezda Semirechenskoi oblasti [Note about the life of the Dungan settlement of the Karakunuz Pishpeksky district of the Semirechye region]. Semipalatinsk: Imperial Russian Geographical Society.Google Scholar
Tolstov, Sergei. 1963. O formirovanii novyh svadebnyh obriadov uzbekskogo naroda. [About the formation of new wedding rituals of Uzbek peoples]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of USSR.Google Scholar
Zhenhua, Hu. 2014. Malen’ki narod dlya bolshogo dela [Small Nation for Big Work]. Kitai 10: 58–59.Google Scholar