Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:18:24.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Multicultural, Multiethnic, and Multiconfessional Bosnia and Herzegovina: Myth and Reality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Cynthia Simmons
Cynthia Simmons*
Affiliation:
Slavic Studies at Boston College, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In early 1992, the “three m's” (tri m), which denoted a multicultural, multiethnic, and multiconfessional Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), became the rallying cry against the forces of disintegration, or more accurately, of partition. These identifying characteristics or national ideals could not avert catastrophe. Indeed, BiH's liminal position at the crossroads of cultures, religions, and history rendered it the most vulnerable of republics in the Yugoslav wars of succession. However “three m” Bosnia and Herzegovina was in 1992, it was less so by 1995. Yet, despite the bloodshed, forced expulsions, migrations, and the inevitable rise in nationalism, citizens of BiH have no choice, in the aftermath, but to examine what their country was before the war and the potential for a new “multi-multi” Bosnia and Herzegovina. Such an investigation must begin with the past, as a Sarajevan colleague implied when I asked her how she envisioned the future in Bosnia. She replied that Bosnians could hardly conceive a future when in 1998 they still had no idea what had happened, and why. This work addresses the reality behind the epithets that gained currency during and after the war, of a “three-m,” “multi-multi,” and multi-kulti (multicultural) Bosnia and Herzegovina. Within the framework of a particular understanding of multiculturalism, it will suggest why, despite its multiethnic and multiconfessional reality, BiH proved in many instances vulnerable to nationalistic rhetoric. This analysis proceeds from the conviction that multiculturalism must be both studied and encouraged in the international community's efforts to support the growth of democratic institutions and practices in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 623 - 638
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

* I would like to acknowledge support for this research from the International Research and Exchanges Board, which funded my travel to the former Yugoslavia in 2001.Google Scholar

1. Payne, Michael, ed., The Dictionary of Cultural and Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 353–354.Google Scholar

2. Marshal, Gordon, ed., The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 344.Google Scholar

3. See, for example, the works by Harris, Leonard on Alain Locke. Leonard Harris, Alain Locke and Values (Savage, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997) and The Philosophy of Alain Locke: Harlem Renaissance and Beyond (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

4. This characterization is intended as a working definition that attempts to resolve seeming conflicts. The fears of those who see multiculturalism as the road to political and moral collapse need not be realized. A multicultural society can sustain a variety of cultures and still retain the loyalty of its citizens to a shared principle or ideal (e.g. democracy).Google Scholar

5. Researchers in multiculturalism continue to debate and refine the concept. However, some consider it to be the inevitable next step in the humanistic movement and struggle for human rights. For example, Taylor, Charles sees the interest in multiculturalism as reflective of the (growing) human need for recognition. He writes of the “politics of recognition” and surveys the philosophical inquiry into the “dialogue” (in the Bakhtinian sense) between the public and the private. See Taylor, Charles, “The Politics of Recognition,” in Gutmann, Amy, ed., Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 25–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. “Critical pluralism” is used here to denote the thoughtful respect for other cultures in dialogue with one's own culturally specific views; in opposition to moral relativism.Google Scholar

7. Green, Judith M., “Educational Multiculturalism, Critical Pluralism, and Deep Democracy,” in Cynthia Willett, ed., Theorizing Multiculturalism: A Guide to the Current Debate (Maiden, MA: Blackwell, 1998), p. 429.Google Scholar

8. Emblematic of this gross generalization was Robert Kaplan's Balkan Ghosts, purported to have influenced then President Bill Clinton and to have affected US policy during the Yugoslav wars. For an analysis of some of the book's misconceptions, see Simmons, Cynthia, “Baedeker Barbarism: Rebecca West's Black Lamb and Gray Falcon and Robert Kaplan's Balkan Ghosts ” Human Rights Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2000, pp. 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Jacques Ancel, “L'Unité balkanique,” Revue internationale des Etudes balkanique, Vol. 1, 1934, p. 128. I wish to thank Svetlana Slaps̆ak, of the Graduate School of Humanities in Ljubljana, Slovenia, for directing me to this journal and body of research.Google Scholar

10. Bosnia was to experience considerable (north-)Western influence again, of course, with the occupation and annexation of BiH by Austria-Hungary from 1878–1914.Google Scholar

11. The dispute over the nature of the independent Bosnian Church and its status when Bosnia fell to the Ottomans continues. In his history of Bosnia, Malcolm, Noel gives greater credence to the research that reveals the heresy of the Bosnian Church as not that of the Bogomils, but of the persistence of particular Byzantine practices that had become unacceptable or heretical in the Roman Church. He notes that even before the Bosnian Church lost converts to Islam, it had come under attack from the Franciscans. See Noel Malcolm, Bosnia: A Short History (New York: New York University Press, 1996), pp. 27–42.Google Scholar

12. Spahić, Mustafa, Koms̆ije (Sarajevo: Press Centra Armije Republike Bosne i Hercegovine, 1994), p. 9.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., p. 11.Google Scholar

14. The sociologist Seligman, Adam B., for instance, identifies trust as one of the values of civilization engendered in the city. Seligman sees the growth of trust as a basic social relation as a modern phenomenon related to increased urbanization. See Adam B. Seligman, The Problem of Trust (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

15. Mahmutćehajić, Rusmir, Bosnia the Good: Tolerance and Tradition (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2000). Translation of Dobra Bosna (Zagreb: Durieux, 1997).Google Scholar

16. Nijaz Duraković offers an in-depth analysis of Bosnian conversion to Islam in Prokletstvo muslimana (Sarajevo: Oslobodjenje, 1993). See, in particular, “Nestanak bogomila i proces islamizacije,” pp. 26–45.Google Scholar

17. See Malcom, Bosnia, p. 8. In Sefardi u Bosni, a study from 1911, edited by Kemal Bakars̆ić and republished in 1996 (Sarajevo: Bosanska biblioteka), Moritz Levy describes the humanitarian welcome that Sultan Bajazit II gave the Jews in Turkey and recounts in detail the establishment of the Jewish quarter in Sarajevo. See pp. 9–18.Google Scholar

18. Karahasan, Dz̆evad, “Sarajevo, Portrait of an Internal City,” in Sarajevo, Exodus of a City (translation of Selidbe), trans. Slobodan Drakulić (New York: Kodansha International, 1994), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

19. Glenny, Misha, The Fall of Yugoslavia (New York: Penguin, 1996), p. 143; Christopher Bennett, Yugoslavia's Bloody Collapse (New York: New York University Press, 1995), pp. 182–183.Google Scholar

20. Svetlana Broz, Tito's grand-daughter and author of Dobri ljudi u vremenu zla (Good People in a Time of Evil) (Banja Luka: Media centar “Prelom,” 2000), a collection of testimonies of interethnic deeds of heroism during the Bosnian war), came to this conclusion as well, as she expressed in her International Women's Day lecture (8 March 2000) at the International Institute in Boston.Google Scholar

21. Levy, Moric, Sephardim in Bosnien (Sarajevo: S̆tamparija Daniala A. Kanon, 1911), Sefardi u Bosni, trans. Ljiljana Masai (Sarajevo: Bosanska biblioteka, 1996).Google Scholar

22. Ibid., pp. 57–64.Google Scholar

23. Malcolm, Bosnia, p. 145.Google Scholar

24. Duraković, Prokletstvo Muslimana, p. 86.Google Scholar

25. Zulfikarpas̆ić, Adil, Bos̆njak (Zagreb: Nakladni zavod GLOBUS, 1995), p. 99.Google Scholar

26. Malcolm, Bosnia, pp. 166–167.Google Scholar

27. Robert Donia, Sarajevo's Pluralism in the Twentieth Century, paper delivered at the World Congress of the International Council for Central and East European Studies (Tampere, Finland, 3 August 2000).Google Scholar

28. For example, Senad Pec̆anin implied as much in his characterization of Sarajevo as unicultural (see the section Modern Sarajevo/Bosnia above), and the writer and director of the P.E.N. Center in Sarajevo, Ferida Duraković, said, in an interview with me in 1998, that before the war, when hearing someone's name for the first time, she never thought about that person's ethnicity (which can be revealed by the last name), but that since the war it is the first thing she thinks of.Google Scholar

29. Tomljenović, Borka, Bosnian Counterpoint (Ann Arbor: s.n.), pp. 103–104.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., p. 108Google Scholar

31. Osti, Josip, Jevreji u Sarajevu i Bosni (Ljubljana: Biblioteka EGZIL-abc, 1993), p. 23.Google Scholar

32. As Chief Librarian of the now destroyed National and University Library, Kemal Bakars̆ić was instrumental in the most recent sparing of the Haggadah. He has detailed the fate of the codex in “Never-Ending Story of C-4436 A.K.A. The Sarajevo's Haggada Codex,” Wiener Slawistischer Almanach Sonderband 52, 2001, pp. 267–289; http://www.openbook.ngo.ba/quarterly/no17/neverending.htm Google Scholar

33. See, e.g., Ramet, Sabrina Petra, Balkan Babel (Boulder: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 40–42; Laura Silber and Allan Little, Yugoslavia: Death of a Nation (New York: TV Books, 1996), pp. 26, 29.Google Scholar

34. Senad Pec̆anin, Neiman Lecture, Center for European Studies, Harvard University, 1 May 2000.Google Scholar

35. On the basis of my experience among students, writers, and intellectuals in Sarajevo, most frequent and extensive in the 1970s, I would have to agree as well. And more recently I have heard this conviction expressed in conversation with Sarajevans who do not represent the intellectual elite.Google Scholar

36. Berić, Gojko, Sarajevo na kraju svijeta (Sarajevo: Oslobodjenje Sarajevo, 1994), pp. 164–165.Google Scholar

37. Bogdanović, Bogdan, “The City and Death” (translation of “The Ritual Murder of the City”), in Joanna Labon, ed., Balkan Blues: Writing out of Yugoslavia (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1995), p. 36.Google Scholar

38. Emblematic of the effort among nationalist writers to incite ethnic pride (and self-pity) is Dobrica Ćosić's (revisionist) historical novel A Time of Death, a narrative of World War I from the Serbian perspective. For other examples, see Ramet, Sabrina Petra, Balken Babel (Boulder: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 197–200. Ramet dedicates an entire chapter to the influence on rising nationalism of folk-inspired popular music. See also Dubravka Ugres̆ić, The Culture of Lies (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998), pp. 128–150; and Eric Gordy, “Rokeri i turbas̆i as Windows into Serbia's Social Divide,” Balkanologie, Vol. 1, 2000, pp. 55–82.Google Scholar

39. Bogdanović, , “Zavas̆ena sećanja,” in Grad kenotaf (Zagreb: Durieux, 1993), pp. 46–48.Google Scholar

40. Bošnjović, Ilijas, Demografska crna jama (Sarajevo: Veselin Masleaa, 1990).Google Scholar

41. Bogdanović, “The City and Death,” p. 73.Google Scholar

42. During World War II and in the aftermath that produced modern Yugoslavia, this disowning was, of course, far from subtle. On the heels of Ustas̆a atrocities during the war, Tito's security chief Aleksandar Ranković implemented a policy of forced repatriation of Muslims from the Sandjak and Macedonia to Turkey. See Zulfikarpas̆ić, Bos̆njak, p. 104.Google Scholar

43. Ibid., pp. 104–105.Google Scholar

44. Marković, Mirko, “The Intellectual and Creative Conscience of a Writer,” in Forgotten Country 2: War Prose in Bosnia-Herzegovina (1992–1995) (Sarajevo: Association of Writers of Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1997), p. 92.Google Scholar

45. Of course, equitable multiethnic political representation was, theoretically, a goal of communist governmental organization in Yugoslavia. These quotas had little bearing, however, on how power was actually distributed across ethnicities. Political inequities and disenfranchisement of segments of the population (i.e. non-communists) fostered feelings of resentment among some, who then became more receptive to nationalist rhetoric.Google Scholar

46. Other researchers have investigated the failure of cohesive forces on the level of nation (“Yugoslavia”) and republic (“Bosnia”). In Making a Nation, Breaking a Nation, Andrew Wachtel found the support for a “supranational Yugoslav culture” insufficient and waning over time (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998). With respect to Bosnia, Tone Bringa cites Marilyn Strathern, who argues that “in order to create a collective identity, individuals must submerge the heteregenous sources of their identity, rather than just add these to one another.” See Bringa, Tone, ed., Being Muslim the Bosnian Way (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), p. 32. I would agree that contiguous but separate ethnicities in parts of BiH did not contribute to a sense of “Bosnia.” However, I would disagree with Strathern's conception/requirement of an exclusive collective identity. The goal of multiculturalism, it would seem, is to maintain multiple identities; although, of course, there must be an overarching (supranational) identification with the larger nation. “Brotherhood and unity” was doomed from the start in Yugoslavia, for the multiculturalism that it invoked could not develop in the absence of political freedoms.Google Scholar