Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Every nation has its own history and its own way to create civic culture. The problem of civil society in Estonia is rather specific being first and foremost related to the nation's cultural development and only then with its political development. The restoration of civil society in Estonia from 1987 to 1988 is based on our own historical experience of civil initiative rather than the example of the other post-Communist countries of Eastern Europe.
1. Aili Aarelaid-Tart and Martti Siisiainen, “Voluntary Associations in Estonia and in Finland from the Nineteenth Century to the Present Time,” Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences (henceforth PEAS)Vol. 42, No. 2, 1993, pp. 217–220.Google Scholar
2. E. Jansen, “Voluntary Associations in Estonia. The Model of the 19th Century,” PEAS, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1993, p. 117.Google Scholar
3. W. J. Morgan, “Homo Sovieticus: Political Education and Civil Society in the Soviet Union,” L. Katus and J. Toth, eds., ESVA On the Role of Voluntary Associations in the Culture (Leiden: ESVA, 1990), pp. 141–143.Google Scholar
4. Adam B. Seligman, “Trust and the Meaning of Civil Society,” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1992, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
5. Edward Shils, “The Virtues of Civil Society,” Government and Opposition, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1991, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Indrek Tart, The Poetry Book in the Estonian Language as a Cultural Indicator in Estonia and Inside Exile Estonian Communities in 1945–1992 (Bibliometrical Aspect), Compendium of Master's Thesis (Tallinn, 1993), pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
7. Eesti NSV rahvamajandus 1980. aastal (Economy of the Estonian SSR in 1980) (Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, 1981), p. 315.Google Scholar
8. Ene Saar, “Rahvuskesksete seltside liikmeskonna territoriaalne jaotus ja dünaamika (1979–1989),” (“Territorial Distribution of All-Estonian Nation-Related Voluntary Associations (1979-1989)”) PEAS, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1993, p. 190.Google Scholar
9. Sirje Kiin, Rein Ruutsoo, Andres Tarand, 40 kirja lugu (“The Story of the Letter of the 40”) (Tallinn: Olion, 1990).Google Scholar
10. Daniel Siegel & Jenny Yancey, The Rebirth of Civil Society. The Development of the Nonprofit Sector in East Central Europe and the Role of Western Assistance (New York: The Rockefeller Brothers Fund, 1992); Marcia A. Weigle and Jim Butterfield, “Civil Society in Reforming Communist Regimes. The Logic of Emergence,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1992, pp. 1–23; David A. Reidy, Jr., “Eastern Europe, Civil Society and the Real Revolution,” Praxis International, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1992, pp. 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Zsuzsa Hegedus, “Social Movements and Social Change in Self-Creative Society; New Civil Initiatives in the International Arena,” International Sociology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1989, pp. 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Alberto Melucci, “The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements,” Social Research, Vol. 52, No. 4, 1985, pp. 797–800.Google Scholar
13. Jean L. Cohen, “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements,” Social Research, Vol. 52, No. 4, 1985, p. 665.Google Scholar
14. The law on ethnic minorities, reintroduced with amendments in 1993 after adoption by parliament on October 26, 1993 and proclamation by the Republic of Estonia president on November 11, 1993.Google Scholar
15. Our poll conducted in February-August, 1993, included 200 leaders of currently active associations.Google Scholar
16. Pierre Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production. Essays on Art and Literature (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), pp. 184–187.Google Scholar
17. “Introduction”, John Keane, ed., Civil Society and the State. New European Perspectives. (London-New York: Verso, 1988), pp. 21–25.Google Scholar