Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T09:16:49.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The new Russian nationalism: imperialism, ethnicity and authoritarianism 2000–15, edited by Pål Kolstø and Helge Blakkisrud, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2016, 436 pp., $75 (hardback), ISBN 978-1474410427.

Review products

The new Russian nationalism: imperialism, ethnicity and authoritarianism 2000–15, edited by Pål Kolstø and Helge Blakkisrud, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2016, 436 pp., $75 (hardback), ISBN 978-1474410427.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Pål Kolstø  and
Helge Blakkisrud
Pål Kolstø
Affiliation:
University of Oslo [email protected]
Helge Blakkisrud
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , July 2017 , pp. 716 - 719
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hechter, Michael. 2000. Containing Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hosking, Geoffrey. 1997. Russia: People and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kolst⊘, Pål. 2016. “Crimea vs. Donbas: How Putin Won Russian Nationalist Support – and Lost It Again.” Slavic Review 75 (3): 702–725.Google Scholar
Shevel, Oxana. 2011. “Russian Nation-building from Yel'tsin to Medvedev: Ethnic, Civic or Purposefully Ambiguous?” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (2): 179–202.Google Scholar