Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:17:28.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mihiz in the Sixties: Politics and Drama between Nationalism and Authoritarianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Nick Miller
Nick Miller*
Affiliation:
Boise State University, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between 1981 and 1991, Serbian intellectual and political life were energized by a movement to overcome the legacies of the Tito regime. Tito himself had died in 1980, but his political heirs, insecure and unimaginative, had proclaimed that even though Tito was gone, his image would continue to guide and bind the peoples of Yugoslavia: “After Tito—Tito!” In Belgrade, the anti-Titoist movement began as a struggle for free expression. As Borislav Mihajlović Mihiz, one of the leaders of the Committee for the Protection of Artistic Freedom (founded in 1982), said later, all political freedom flows from the right to free speech. Mihiz's commitment to the defense and nurturing of this right was consistent with values he had expressed throughout his career as a literary critic, playwright, and theater director. Yet the movement that he helped found in 1982 would be transformed after 1986 into something less obviously principled and much more visceral, as the issue of Kosovo's fate came to consume Serbia's intellectual elite. The movement for free speech segued into a movement to reclaim Kosovo for Serbia without missing a beat, thanks to the ability of Serbian intellectuals to frame the Kosovo problem as a product of the suppression of open dialogue in Yugoslavia. Kosovo replaced Gojko Djogo, Jovan Radulović, Dušan Jovanović, and other censored Serbian writers as the emotive fulcrum of the anti-Titoist movement in Serbia. The free speech movement was transformed into a movement of rage at the Tito regime's allegedly systematic injustices towards Serbs. Since the wars of Yugoslav succession began in 1991, commentators have conveniently forgotten that what ended up a violent and irrational movement in the late 1980s began in such a reasonable fashion. Borislav Mihajlović Mihiz was the face of the early free speech movement.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 603 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

* I would like to thank Carol Lilly for her helpful criticism on this article. I would also like to thank the International Research and Exchanges Board, American Council of Learned Societies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, and Boise State University for their financial assistance in the course of the research on this study.Google Scholar

1. Boro Krivokapić, “Srbi su dvoglav narod,” NIN (Belgrade), 12 April 1991, p. 32.Google Scholar

2. Janković, Vladeta and Janković, Milan, eds, Drugi o Mihizu (Belgrade: Stubovi kulture, 1998).Google Scholar

3. Gligorijević, Milo, Odgovor Miće Popovića (Belgrade: Nezavisna izdanja, 1983), p. 53.Google Scholar

4. Mihiz, Borislav Mihajlović, “Knjiz̆evni razgovori,” in Od istog c̆itaoca (Belgrade: Nolit, 1956), pp. 165–166.Google Scholar

5. As happened in 1952, when he mercilessly attacked two books by the surrealist writer Marko Ristić.Google Scholar

6. “Postavlja se pitanje konkretne odgovornosti pisaca komunista koji su potpisali ‘Predlog za razmišljanje,”’ Politika (Belgrade), 1 April 1967, p. 6.Google Scholar

7. I am using the translation by Christopher Spalatin, “Serbo-Croatian or Serbian and Croatian? Considerations on the Croatian Declaration and Serbian Proposal of March 1967,” Journal of Croatian Studies, Vols 7–8, 1966–1967, pp. 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. The Novi Sad Agreement of 1954 is printed in Vukomanović, Slavko, Jezik, drus̆tvo, nacija (Belgrade: Juslovenska revija, 1987), pp. 164–165. For an excellent recent summary of linguistic politics in Yugoslavia, see Robert D. Greenberg, “The Politics of Dialects among Serbs, Croats, and Muslims in the Former Yugoslavia,” East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1996, pp. 393–415.Google Scholar

9. “Rodu o jeziku I” and “Rodu o jeziku II,” Knjiz̆evne novine, 1, 15 April 1967, pp. 10–11. Information can also be found in Spalatin, “Serbo-Croation or Serbian and Croatian?” Audrey Helfant Budding calculated the ratio of non-party to party members in Serb Intellectuals and the National Question (Harvard University, PhD. dissertation, 1998), pp. 139–140.Google Scholar

10. Quoted in Spalatin, “Serbo-Croatian or Serbian and Croation?” p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. “Pismo Zorana Gavrilovića upućeno upravi udruz̆enja knjiz̆evnika Srbije,” Politika, 27 March 1967, p. 7.Google Scholar

12. “‘Deklaracija i ‘predlog’ su politic̆ki blizanci,” Politika, 2 April 1967, p. 9.Google Scholar

13. “‘Deklaracija i ‘predlog’ su politic̆ki blizanci.”Google Scholar

14. Ibid.Google Scholar

15. Isaković, Antonije, “Zas̆to sam potpisao ‘Predlog za razmis̆ljanje',” in Govori i razgovori (Gornji Milanovac, Yugoslavia: Dec̆je novine and Pristina, Kosovo: Jedinstvo, 1990), p. 15. The italics are in the printed version, although it is difficult to imagine how they were conveyed before the City Committee.Google Scholar

16. Ibid., p. 16.Google Scholar

17. “Osuda idejne osnove i sadrz̆ine ‘Deklaracije’ i ‘Predloga,”’ Politika, 3 April 1967, p. 5.Google Scholar

18. Ibid.Google Scholar

19. Ibid.Google Scholar

20. “Rodu o jeziku II,” Knijiz̆evne novine, 15 April 1967, p. 11.Google Scholar

21. Mihiz, Autobiografija—o drugima, Vol. 2 (Belgrade: Beogradski izdavac̆ko-grafic̆ki zavod, 1995), p. 287. Mihiz claims that his removal was covered by a change in policy on the jury: “in order to eliminate me, after eighteen years the permanent jury was suspended and an alternating one established.” But the jury which met in 1967 was already altered from that permanent jury that Mihiz mentions (which had included Mihiz, Milan Bogdanović, Eli Finci, Velibor Gligorić, and Zoran Mis̆ić). For the first several years of the award, the jury consisted of Stevan Majstorović, Milan Bogdanović, Zoran Mis̆ić, Eli Finci, Velibor Gligorić, and Mihiz. Majstorović left after one year. After Mihiz left in 1970, the jury did change more often.Google Scholar

22. Kadić, Ante, Moji izgoni ia Jugoslavije i povratak u Hrvatsku (Split: Knjiz̆evni krug, 1992), p. 66.Google Scholar

23. Ibid, p. 162.Google Scholar

24. Janković and Janković, eds, Drugi o Mihizu, p. 490.Google Scholar

25. Mihiz, , “Banović Strahinja,” in Izdajice (Belgrade: Beogradski izdavac̆ko-grafic̆ki zavod, 1986), pp. 5–119. The poem is translated in Milne Holton and Vasa D. Mihailovich, Songs of the Serbian People: From the Collections of Vuk Karadzic (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997), pp. 106–130; see also Svetozar Koljević, The Epic in the Making (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), pp. 132–138.Google Scholar

26. Holton and Mihailovich, Songs, p. 128.Google Scholar

27. Mihiz, Banović Strahinja, p. 130.Google Scholar

28. Holton and Mihailovich, Songs, p. 112.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., p. 128.Google Scholar

30. Mihiz, Banović Strahinja, p. 99.Google Scholar

31. Ibid., p. 107.Google Scholar

32. Holton and Mihailovich, Songs, p. 130.Google Scholar

33. Mihiz, Banović Strahinja, p. 115.Google Scholar

34. Ibid., p. 119.Google Scholar

35. Pas̆ić, Feliks, “Da ponovo ne budem imao s̆ta da kazem,” in Mihiz, Kazivanja i ukazivanja (Belgrade: Beogradski izdavac̆ko-grafic̆ki zavod, 1994), p. 61.Google Scholar

36. Ibid., p. 62.Google Scholar

37. Mihiz, “Komandant Sajler,” in idem, Izdajice, p. 272.Google Scholar

38. Ibid., p. 233.Google Scholar

39. Ibid., p. 240.Google Scholar

40. Ibid., p. 292.Google Scholar

41. Holton and Mihailovich, Songs, pp. 163–167.Google Scholar

42. Mihiz, “Kraljević Marko,” in idem, Izdajice, p. 168.Google Scholar

43. Ibid., p. 169.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., p. 171.Google Scholar

45. Ibid., p. 184.Google Scholar

46. Miller, Nicholas J., “The Nonconformists: Dobrica Ćosić and Mića Popović Envision Serbia,” Slavic Review, Vol. 58, No. 3, 1999, pp. 515–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. “Vreme, knjiz̆evnost, jezik …,” in Ćosić, Dobrica, Stvarno i moguće: C̆lanci i ogledi (Rijeka, Croatia: Otokar Kers̆ovani, 1982), pp. 40–41.Google Scholar