Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:04:57.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Texture Analysis of Oriented PZT Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. R. Peterson
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
N. W. Medendorp Jr.
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
E. B. Slamovich
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
K. J. Bowman
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access

Abstract

PZT thin films with the composition Pb(Zr0.6Ti0 4)O3 were processed via metallo-organic decomposition (MOD) with {111} and {100} orientations. Ferroelectric measurements showed that the {111} and {100} oriented films had remanent polarizations of 19.5 μC/cm2 and 16 μC/cm2, respectively. Both x-ray pole figure analysis and the Harris texture index were used to quantify the degree of {100}, {110}, and {111} orientation in each film, with reasonable agreement between the two methods. The {100} oriented thin film was determined to be 582 times random for the Harris technique versus 522 times random for pole figure analysis, while the {111} oriented film was 41 times random for the Harris technique and 81 times random for pole figure analysis. The axisymmetric texture of the films allow 2-D pole figure analysis to provide a quantitative characterization of film texture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hirano, S., Yogo, T., Kikuta, K., Araki, Y., Saitoh, M., and Ogasahara, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 75 [10] 2785–89 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Tuttle, B. A., Voight, J. A., Goodnow, D. C., Lamppa, D. L., Headley, J., Eatough, M. O., Zender, G., Nasby, R. D., and Rodgers, S. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76 [6] 1537–44 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Klee, M., Eusmann, R., Waser, R., and Brand, W., J. of Appl. Phys. 72 [4] 1556–76 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Chen, S. -Y, Chen, I. -W, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 [9] 2332–36 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Chen, S. -Y, Chen, I. -W, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 [9] 2337–44 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Reaney, I. M., Brooks, K., Klissurska, R., Pawlaczyk, C, and Setter, N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 [5] 1209–16 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Aoki, K., Fukuda, Y., Numata, K., Nishimura, A., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33 5155–58 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Mansour, S. A., Liedl, G. L., Vest, R. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 78 [6] 1617–23 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Harris, G. B., Philos. Mag., 43 [1] 113–23 (1952).Google Scholar
10. Valvoda, V., Jarvinen, M., Pow. Diff., 5 [4] 200–3 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Wenk, H. -R., Preferred Orientation in Deformed Metals and Rocks: An Introduction to Modem Texture Analysis, Wenk, H. -R., ed., Academic Press, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
12. Mansour, S. A., Binford, D. A., and Vest, R. W., Integ. Ferro., 1, 43 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Peterson, C. R., Medendorp, N. W. Jr.,, Slamovich, E. B., and Bowman, K. J., to be published (1996).Google Scholar