Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:35:27.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Energy Loss Structures in XPS Characterisation of Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. E. Castle
Affiliation:
The University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
I. Abu-Talib
Affiliation:
The University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
S. A. Richardson
Affiliation:
The University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes advances in the use of the energy loss background associated with individual photoelectron peaks. The subtraction of a Shirley-type background is now normal practice in quantitative XPS analysis. However, in the case of a composite peak containing features from differing depths the subtraction of a common background has a clear disadvantage: i.e. the proportion of background rise associated with each component should be different but is, in fact, fixed. A peak-fitting procedure is described which enables individual backgrounds to be used for each component. The method has been tested using evaporated overlayers and this enables a mean free path for electrons undergoing small energy losses (less than 10 eV) to be determined. The findings are in accord with those of Tougaard and Sigmund and suggest that the use of background intensities in conjunction with the peaks themselves enables the information depth of XPS to be extended by about 10%. A few observations on the behaviour and use in analysis of the large energy loss structure are made.

The use of the findings to aid in characterisation of the near surface distribution of elements and ions is described for the following systems: the distribution within oxide films on alloys; the locus of disbondment of organic films on metals; and the surface contamination of surfaces removed from aqueous media.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sherwood, P.M.A., Appendix 3, Practical Surface Analysis. Ed. Briggs, D. and Seah, M.P., John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (1983).Google Scholar
2. Castle, J.E., Abu-Talib, I. and Richardson, S.A., Paper to Quantitative Surface Analysis, NPL, Teddington, England. To be published, Surf. Interface Anal.Google Scholar
3. Tougaard, S. and Sigmund, P., Phys. Rev.B, 25, (1982), 44524466.Google Scholar
4. Tougaard, S. and Ignatiev, A., Surf. Sci, 129 (1983), 355365.Google Scholar
5. Procter, A. and Hercules, D.M., Applied Spectroscopy 26 (1), (1984), 4651.Google Scholar
6. Castle, J.E. and Durbin, M.J., Carbon 13 p.2331 (1975).Google Scholar
7. Watts, J.F. and Castle, J.E., J.Mat. Sci. 18, p.29823003.Google Scholar