Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:38:32.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Dependence of the Intrinsic Stress and Biaxial Modulus of Plasma Deposited Silicon Nitride and Silicon Oxynitride Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

David R. Harding
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, NYMA, 21000 Brookpark Rd, Cleveland OH 44135
Linus T. Ogbuji
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, NYMA, 21000 Brookpark Rd, Cleveland OH 44135
Get access

Abstract

The intrinsic stress and biaxial modulus of thin films of amorphous silicon nitride (0.5μm) and silicon oxynitride (1.5 to 2.5 μm) were measured following deposition (Ts=260 to 610°C), and then at discrete intervals throughout an annealing cycle. The biaxial modulus and intrinsic stress of the silicon nitride films increased from 110 GPa and 130 MPa, respectively, to 180 GPa and 680 MPa as the deposition temperature increased from Ts=340°C to Ts=610°C. The elemental composition was unaffected by the deposition temperature. Annealing at 1100°C increased the intrinsic stress to ≃ 1.8 GPa, as nitrogen and hydrogen were lost. Films with “near-stoichiometric” compositions (SiN1.1; H = 12 at.%) did not crack.

Adding oxygen to form silicon oxynitride lowered both the biaxial modulus (20–30 GPa) and the intrinsic stress (−50 to 100 MPa). All the silicon oxynitride compositions (SiO0.3N1.0 to SiO1.7N0.5) were unstable when annealed above the deposition temperature (260°C). Films grown using mostly nitrous oxide (R = N2O/(N20+NH3) < 0.5) oxidized at 350°C to form silica. Simultaneously, the biaxial modulus and intrinsic stress increased to 100 GPa and 170 MPa, respectively. Films grown from mostly ammonia (R <0.5) lost nitrogen and hydrogen and cracked when the temperature exceeded the deposition temperature by 40 to 90°C. The stress induced by the elemental loss was ≃ 600 MPa.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Evans, A.G, Zok, F.W. and Davis, J., Composite Science and Technology 42,3 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Chambers, D.L., Taylor, K.A., Wan, C.T. and Emrick, A.J., Surf.Coat.Technol. 41(3),315 (1990)Google Scholar
3. Harding, D.R., Sutter, J.K., Schuerman, M. and Crane, E.A., J.Mat.Res 9(6), 1583 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Turner, G.W. and Connors, M.K., J.Electrochem Soc, 131 1211 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Blaauw, C., Spring-Thorpe, A.J., Dzioba, S. and Emmerstorfer, B.,J.Electron.Mater.,13, 251 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Nix, W.D., Metallurgical Transactions A, 20A, 2217 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Harding, D.R., Ogbuji, L.U.J.T., Freeman, M.J., submitted to J.Appl.Phys.Google Scholar
8. Harding, D.R., Blanquet, E.A., Eldridge, J. and Bhatt, R., Ceramic Engineering & Science Proceedings, 18th Conference on Composites and Advanced Ceramic Materials-B, 753 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Harding, D.R., Sutter, J.K. and Webb, R.D., HITEMP Review, NASA CP 10146,17 1 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Harding, D.R., Herra-Ferrerio, P., Blanquet, E. and Freeman, M.J., submitted to J.Mat.Res.Google Scholar