Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:39:20.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of Natural Oxidation of Ultra-Thin Aluminum Layers with In-Situ Resistance Measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. Fery ,
W.E. Bailey ,
K. Yamada  and
S.X. Wang
C. Fery
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Eng., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
W.E. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Eng., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
K. Yamada
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Eng., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
S.X. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Eng., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
Get access

Abstract

Exposure to oxygen (1 Torr) at room temperature of thin Al films deposited by UHV ion beam sputtering has been studied using an in-situ resistance measurement set-up. Two lock-in amplifiers allow low noise data acquisition. By monitoring the conductance during deposition and oxidation we can deduce the consumed Al thickness as a function of exposure time (t). It is found that the Al/vacuum interface is diffuse for electron scattering. A two-stage mechanism for natural oxidation is revealed: fast growth (for t<10s) followed by a slow logarithmic growth. A simple model based on interface reactions and place exchange describes the experimental results. The conductance drop after 5 minutes of oxidation is found to decrease for initial Al thicknesses below 30A. This suggests the oxidation rates slow down for thin initial Al thicknesses.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 569: Symposium U – In Situ Process Diagnostics and Modelling , 1999 , 185
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Fehlner, F.P. and Mott, N.F., Oxidation of Metals 2, p. 59, (1970)10.1007/BF00603582Google Scholar
2 Houwman, E.P., Veldhuis, D., Flokstra, J., Rogalla, H., J. Appl. Phys. 67, p. 1992, (1990)10.1063/1.345579Google Scholar
3 Moodera, J.S., Kinder, L.R., Wong, T.M., Meservey, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, p.3273, 1995; W.J. Gallagher, S.S.P. Parkin, Yu Lu, X.P. Brian, A. Marley, K.P. Roche, R.A. Altman, S.A. Rishton, C. Jahnes, T.M. Shaw, G. Xiao, J. Appl. Phys. 81, p. 3741, (1997)10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3273Google Scholar
4 Kirk, C.T. Jr., Huber, E.E. Jr., Surf. Sci. 9, p. 217, (1968)10.1016/0039-6028(68)90174-XGoogle Scholar
5 Mathieu, H.J., Datta, M., Landolt, D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, p331, 1985 10.1116/1.573260Google Scholar
6 Pauw, L.J. van der, Phil. Tech. Rev. 20, p. 220, (1958)Google Scholar
7 Bailey, W.E., Fery, C., Yamada, K., Wang, S.X., to appear in J. Appl. Phys. 85 (10), 1999 10.1063/1.369360Google Scholar
8 Campbell, D.S. in The Use of Thin Films In Physical investigations, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Academic Press, 1966, p. 299 Google Scholar
9 Eckl, Th., Reiss, G., Bruckl, H., Hoffmann, H., J. Appl. Phys. 75, p. 362, (1994)10.1063/1.355859Google Scholar
10 Mayadas, A.F., Feder, R., Rosenberg, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 6, p. 690, (1969)10.1116/1.1315731Google Scholar
11 Eley, D.D., Wilkinson, P.R., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), Ser. A 254, p. 327,1960 Google Scholar
12 Grove, A.S., Physics and Technology of Semiconductor Devices, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1967, p.22 Google Scholar