Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:52:10.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strengthening of Ni3Al by Ternary Additions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

F. Heredia  and
D. P. Pope
F. Heredia
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 3231 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
D. P. Pope
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 3231 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

It is important for a number of reasons to have a basic understanding of the mechanisms by which ternary additions strengthen Ni3Al. First of all, since the basic strength-controlling mechanisms in pure Ni3Al are different from those in pure metals and substitutional solid solutions, it is expected that the mechanisms of solid solution strengthening will also be different in Ni3Al. Secondly, such an understanding will provide valuable insights into the properties of nickel-base superalloys in which Ni3Al is a key constituent. In addition, since new alloys based on an ordered Ni3Al matrix are being developed, it is important to understand the strengthening mechanisms in such alloys. In the present study, flow stress measurements have been performed on single crystals of Ni3Al containing additions of Hf and Ta, and on binary Ni rich, Ni3A1 used as a reference alloy. The data have been collected over a wide range of temperatures, for different orientations within the unit triangle, and as a function of the sense of the applied uniaxial stress. The effect of such additions on the critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) for octahedral slip has been determined and combined with previous data. An attempt is then made to clarify whether a lattice parameter/modulus mismatch effect or a dislocation core effect is the dominant mechanism for the strength increase with compositional changes. It appears that a lattice parameter/modulus mismatch is the dominant mechanism for orientations in which the tension/compression flow stress asymmetry disappears.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 81: Symposium H – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys II , 1986 , 213
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lall, C., Chin, S. and Pope, D. P., Met. Trans., 10A, 1323(1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Yamaguchi, H., Paidar, V. and Pope, D. P., Phil. Mag.,43, 1027(1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Yamaguchi, M., Paidar, V., Pope, D. P. and Vitek, V., Phil. Mag.,45, 867(1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ezz, S., Pope, D. P. and Paidar, V., Acta Met.,30, 921(1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Paidar, V., Yamaguchi, M., Pope, D. P. and Vitek, V., Phil. Mag., 45, 883(1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Paidar, V., Pope, D. P. and Vitek, V., Acta Met., 32, 435(1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Umakoshi, Y., Pope, D. P. and Vitek, V., Acta Met., 32, 449(1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Flinn, P. A., Trans. TMS-AIME, 218, 145(1960).Google Scholar
9. Davies, R. G. and Stoloff, N. S., Trans. TMS-AIME, 233, 714(1965).Google Scholar
10. Takeuchi, S. and Kuramoto, E., Acta Met., 21, 415(1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kear, B. H. and Wilsdorf, H. F. G., Trans. TMS-AIME, 224, 382(1962).Google Scholar
12. Thornton, P. H., Davies, R. C. and Johnston, T. L., Met. Trans., 1A, 207(1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Mulford, R. A. and Pope, D. P., Acta Met., 21, 1375(1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Copley, S. M. and Kear, B. H., Trans.AIME, 239, 977(1967).Google Scholar
15. Ochlai, S., Oya, Y. and Suzuki, T., Acta Met., 32, 289(1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Miller, M. K. and Horton, J. A., present conference.Google Scholar
17. Williams, J. M., Bohn, H. G., Barrett, J. H., Liu, C. T. and Sjoreen, J. P., present conference.Google Scholar
18. Lin, H., Seiberling, E., Lyman, P. and Pope, D. P., present conference.Google Scholar
19. Rawlings, R. D. and Staton-Bevan, A., J. Metals Sci., 10, 505(1975).Google Scholar
20. Aoki, K. and Izumi, O., Phys. Stat. Sol.(a), 38, 587(1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Aoki, K. and Izumi, O., Phys. Stat. Sol.(a), 32, 657(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Noguchi, O., Oya, Y. and Suzuki, T., Met. Trans., 12A, 1647(1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Mishima, Y., Ochiai, S., Yodogama, M. and Suzuki, T., Trans. Jap. Inst. Met., 21, 41(1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. R, L. R.. Curwick: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota (1972).Google Scholar
25. Wee, D. M. and Suzuki, T., Trans. JIM, 20, 634(1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wee, D. M., Noguchl, O., Oya, Y. and Suzuki, T., Trans. JIM, 21, 237(1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Heredia, F. E. and Pope, D. P., Acta Met., 34, 279(1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar