Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:32:15.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strain Relaxation and Surface Roughness as a Function of Growth Temperature in Linearly Graded InxAl1-xAs (x=0.05 to 0.25) Buffers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J.A. Olsen
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Engineering, Univ.of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
E.L. Hu
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Engineering, Univ.of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
S.R. Lee
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0603
I.J. Fritz
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0603
A.J. Howard
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0603
B.E. Hammons
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0603
J.Y. Tsao
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0603
Get access

Abstract

The relation of relaxation to surface morphology in linearly-graded InAlAs was examined as a function of growth temperature using x-ray diffraction and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Samples were grown at temperatures ranging from 370°C to 550°C. Weak diffraction features for samples grown at 370°C and 420°C limited determination of the extent of their relaxation . The fractional relaxation of samples grown between 470°C to 550°C was essentially identical (~77%) and symmetric in orthogonal [110] directions. The character of the surface morphology changed from random small scale roughness to a roughness more periodic in nature as the growth temperature increased. Although no asymmetry was observed in the relaxation, the roughness developed an asymmetry at higher growth temperatures with more prominent ridges along [110]-[110].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mathews, J.W. and Blakeslee, A.E., J. Cryst. Growth 32, 265 (1976).Google Scholar
2 Lord, S.M., B, Pezeshki, and Harris, J.S., Electron. Lett. 28, 1193 (1992).Google Scholar
3 Harmand, J.C., Matsuno, T., and Inoue, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28(7), Ll 101 (1989).Google Scholar
4 Fitzgerald, E.A., Xie, Y.H., Monroe, D., Silverman, P.J., Kuo, J.M., Kortan, A.R., Thiel, F.A., and Weir, B., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10(4), 1807, (1992).Google Scholar
5 Michel, J., Fitzgerald, E.A., Xie, Y.H., Silverman, P.J., Morse, M., and Kimmerling, L.C., J. Elec. Matrl. 21(12), 1099 (1992).Google Scholar
6 Tersoff, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62(7), 693 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Fritz, I.J., Hammons, B.E., Howard, A.J., Brennan, T.M., Olsen, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62(9), 919 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Muraki, K., Fukatsu, S., Shiraki, Y., and Ito, R., J. Cryst. Growth 127, 546, (1993).Google Scholar
9 Thompson, L.R. and Doyle, B.L., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. EA-18, 141 (1988).Google Scholar
10 Warren, P.D., PhD, Thesis, Trinity College, Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
11 Olsen, J.A., Hu, E.L., Lee, S.R., Fritz, I.J., Howard, A.J., Hammons, B.E., and Tsao, J.Y. to be published.Google Scholar