Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:57:47.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Steady-State Photocarrier Grating Technique Applied to a-Si:H Thin Film Transistors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1993

F. WANG
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich,Physics Department E16, W-8046 Garching, Germany
M. REISSNER
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich,Physics Department E16, W-8046 Garching, Germany
T. FISCHER
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich,Physics Department E16, W-8046 Garching, Germany
S. GREBNER
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich,Physics Department E16, W-8046 Garching, Germany
R. SCHWARZ
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich,Physics Department E16, W-8046 Garching, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The transport properties of a-Si:H based thin film transistors have been characterized by the ambipolar diffusion length (Lamb) which was measured by the steady-state photocarrier grating technique (SSPG). The results show that with increasing positive gate voltage (Vg) the photoconductivity increases, but Lamb decreases. The above results can be consistently explained in terms of the shift of the Fermi level towards the conduction band edge with increasing V g. On the other hand, from the analysis of the SSPG results it is found that the factor γS, which is related to the interface recombination velocity, increases with V g.This indicates that when narrowing the conductive channel the recombination of the carriers at the interface increases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Anderson, D.A. and Spear, W.E., Phil. Mag. 36, 695 (1977).Google Scholar
[2] Yang, L., Catalano, A., Arya, R. R., and Balberg, I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 908 (1990)Google Scholar
[3] Kocka, J., Nebel, C. E., and Abel, C. D., Phil. Mag. B63, 221 (1991).Google Scholar
[4] Müller, G., Kalbitzer, S., and Mannsperger, H., Appl. Phys. A39, 243 (1986).Google Scholar
[5] Kakinuma, H., Phys. Rev. B39, 10473 (1989).Google Scholar
[6] Matsumara, M. and Nara, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 6443 (1980).Google Scholar
[7] Kagawa, T., Matsumoto, N., and Kumabe, K., Phys. Rev. B28, 4570 (1983)Google Scholar
[8] Ritter, D., Zeldov, E., and Weiser, K., Phys. Rev. B38, 8296 (1988).Google Scholar
[9] Hepburn, A.R., Marshall, J.M., and Main, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2215 (1986).Google Scholar
[10] Grünewald, M., PhD thesis, Marburg University, 1984.Google Scholar
[11] Simmon, J. G. and Taylor, G. W., Phys. Rev. 4, 502 (1971).Google Scholar
[12] Hack, M., Guha, S., and Shur, M., Phys. Rev. 30, 6991 (1984).Google Scholar
[13] Rose, A., Concepts in Photoconductivity and Allied Proplems, (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
[14] Wang, F. and Schwarz, R., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 791 (1992).Google Scholar
[15] Haridim, M., Weiser, K., Mell, H., Phil. Mag. 67, 171 (1993).Google Scholar