Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:11:09.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size Effects and Domains in Ferroelectric Thin Film Actuators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Trolier-Mckinstry ,
C. A. Randall ,
J. P. Maria ,
C. Theis ,
D. G. Schlom ,
J. Shepard Jr.  and
K. Yamakawa
S. Trolier-Mckinstry
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
C. A. Randall
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
J. P. Maria
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
C. Theis
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
D. G. Schlom
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
J. Shepard Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
K. Yamakawa
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Ferroelectric thin films typically differ from bulk ceramics in terms of both the average grain size and the degree of stress imposed on the film by the substrate. Studies on bulk ceramics have demonstrated that the number of domain variants within grains depends on the grain size for sizes <˜lμm. This can diminish the poling efficiency of the material. Since most thin films show primary grain sizes well below a micron, similar effects should be observed in films. In addition, since the perovskite ferroelectrics contain ferroelastic as well as ferroelectric domains, it seems clear that stress in thin films may markedly alter the degree to which domain walls contribute to the observed properties. In this paper, the relative importance of these factors are discussed for several types of ferroelectric thin films. Films have been prepared by pulsed laser deposition, magnetron sputtering, and by sol-gel processing. It has been found that epitaxial BaTiO3 films are ferroelectric at 77K down to thicknesses as low as ˜ 60nm. Data on the low and high field electrical properties are reported as a function of temperature, the film crystallinity, and film thickness for representative perovskite films.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 433: Symposium T – Ferroelectric Thin Films V , 1996 , 363
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Zhang, X. L., Chen, Z. X., Cross, L. E., and Schulze, W. A., J. Mat. Sci. 18, 968 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Kim, Namchul, PhD Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 1994.Google Scholar
3. Cao, W. and Randall, C., accepted J. Phys. Chem,. Sol. (1996).Google Scholar
4. Maria, Jon-Paul, MS Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 1996.Google Scholar
5. Arlt, G., Hennings, D., and With, G. de, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 1619 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Kinoshita, K. and Yamaji, A., J. Appl. Phys. 47, 371 (1975).Google Scholar
7. Desu, S. B., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 2981 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Abe, K. and Komatsu, S. in Ferroelectric Thin Films IV, edited by Tuttle, B. A. et al. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 243, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).Google Scholar
9. Dudkevich, V. P., Mukhortov, V. M., Golovko, Y. I., Sindeev, Y. G., and Fesenko, E. G., Sov. Phys. Sol. State 65 463 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Frey, M. H. and Payne, D. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2735 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Terauchi, H., Watanabe, Y., Kasatane, H., Kamagaki, K., Yano, Y., Terashima, T., and Bando, Y., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61, 2194 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Williamson, G. K. and Hall, W. H., Acta Met. 1 22 (1953).Google Scholar
13. Forsbergh, P. W. Jr., Phys. Rev. 93 686 (1954).Google Scholar
14. Theis, C. D. and Schlom, D. G., MRS Proc. 401 171 (1996).Google Scholar
15. Theis, C., M.S. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University 1996.Google Scholar
16. Pompe, W., Gong, X., Suo, Z., and Speck, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 74 6012 (1993).Google Scholar
17. Chen, J., Udayakumar, K. R., Brooks, K. G., and Cross, L. E., J. Appl. Phys. 71 4465 (1992).Google Scholar
18. Garino, T. J. and Harrington, M. in Ferroelectric Thin Films II, ed. Kingon, A. I., Myers, E. R., and Tuttle, B., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 243, Pittsburgh, PA (1992) pp. 341.Google Scholar
19. Yamakawa, K., Trolier-McKinstry, S., Dougherty, J. P., and Krupanidhi, S. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 2014 (1995).Google Scholar
20. Yamakawa, K., Gachigi, K. Wa, Trolier-McKinstry, S., and Dougherty, J. P., Ferr. Lett. 20 149 (1996).Google Scholar
21. Fesenko, O. E., Kolesova, R. V., and Sindeyev, Yu. G., Ferroelectrics 20 177 (1978).Google Scholar