Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:34:15.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Practical Bloomery Smelting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

W. H. Lee Sauder
Affiliation:
Woods Creek Forge, 229B McLaughlin Street, Lexington, VA 24450 Washington & Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450
Henry G. Williams III
Affiliation:
Woods Creek Forge, 229B McLaughlin Street, Lexington, VA 24450 Washington & Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450
Get access

Abstract

The art and technique of bloomery smelting, man's original method for winning metalliciron from its ore, has been largely lost in recent centuries. Many reconstructions of this technique have been attempted by archaeologists in the last 30 years. These experimental smelts have tended to be rather disappointing in terms of the production of usable iron; nonetheless, many conclusions have been drawn from this work.

The main goal of our work with bloomery smelting is the production of iron for the creation of forged sculpture. Our focus on producing a usable product has led us to a somewhat different view of the technology from what has been published in the archaeological literature.

In this paper, we will briefly summarize our work through the spring of 2000, which has been published elsewhere. We'll then report our recent findings from the 2000-2001 smelting season, describing a typical smelt of the most efficient smelting regimen we have yet discovered. We will pay particular attention to methods that differ from those of other experimenters, especially in regards to blowing rate, slag management, and the recycling of furnace products. Finally, we'll point toward areas of upcoming research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sauder, L. and Williams, S., Historical Metallurgy 36 (1), (2002 in press).Google Scholar
2. Tylecote, R.F, Austin, J.N and Wraith, A.E, “The Mechanism of the Bloomery Process in Shaft Furnaces”, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, 209, 343, (1971).Google Scholar
3. Tylecote, R.F, Austin, J.N and Wraith, A.E, “The Mechanism of the Bloomery Process in Shaft Furnaces”, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute 209, 362, (1971).Google Scholar
4. Tylecote, R.F, Austin, J N. and Wraith, A.E, “The Mechanism of the Bloomery Process in Shaft Furnaces”, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute 209, 348, (1971).Google Scholar
5. Crew, P., “The Experimental Production of Bar Iron”, Journal of the Historical Metallurgy Society 25, 27, (1991).Google Scholar
6. Harvey, D., “Reconstructing the American Bloomery Process”, The Colonial Williamsburg Historic Trades Annual, 36, (1988).Google Scholar
7. Espelund, A., “The Evenstad Process-Description, Excavation, Experiment and Metallurgical Evaluation” in Early Iron Production-Archaeology, Technology and Experiments, edited by Norbach, L., (Lejre 1997) p. 54.Google Scholar
9. Mikkelsen, P., “Straw in Slag-Pit Furnaces” in Early Iron Production-Archaeology, Technology and Experiments, edited by Norbach, L., (Lejre 1997) p. 6366.Google Scholar
10. Tholander, E, Experimental Studies on Early Iron Making, (Stockholm 1987).Google Scholar
11. Sim, D, Beyond The Bloom-Bloom refining and iron artifact production in the Romanworld, (Oxford BAR IS 725, 1998).Google Scholar
12. Ross, Peter and Sperry, Mark, personal communication.Google Scholar
13. Rehder, J E, The Mastery and uses of Fire in Antiquity, (McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal, 2000) p.77.Google Scholar