Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:39:34.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Palaeohydrogeological Evidences from Fracture Filling Minerals - Results from the Äspö/Laxemar Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Eva-Lena Tullborg*
Affiliation:
Terralogica AB, Gråbo Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Two different EU projects: the EQUIP project (Evidences from Quaternary Infills from Palaeohydrogeology) running from 1997 to 2000 and the ongoing PADAMOT-project (Palaeohydrogeological Data Analysis and Model Testing) have addressed the possibility of using fracture minerals as recorders of past hydrochemical and hydrogeological environments. The Swedish contribution in these two projects has concentrated on studies of fracture filling calcites from the Äspö/Laxemar area, southeast Sweden.

The analyses applied in the two projects comprise stable isotope ratios of carbon and oxygen and strontium together with trace element contents and textural studies. The results obtained so far (mainly from the EQUIP project) show that several generations of calcite can be identified, chemical zoning is common, and the influence on calcite precipitation of fresh and marine water decreases with depth. It can be concluded that fine scale zoning, possible dissolution/redistribution of calcite, and the disturbances caused by drilling (where loose material which may contain young calcite precipitates were lost), introduce uncertainties in the recognition of different calcite generations. However, despite these problems it is indicated that calcite fracture fillings in Precambrian bedrock environments can add information e.g. concerning changes in groundwater chemistry and redox conditions in the past. The possibilities and problems with palaeohydrogeological interpretations are discussed based on the available data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pedersen, K., Ekendahl, S., Tullborg, E-L., Furnes, H., Thorseth, I-G. and Tumyr, O.. Geology. 25, (1997) pp 827830.Google Scholar
2. Smellie, J.A.T., Laaksoharju, M., and Wikberg, P.. J. Hydrol. 172, (1995) ppl47169.Google Scholar
3. Laaksoharju, M., Tullborg, E.-L., Wikberg, P., Wallin, B. and Smellie, J.A.T.. Appl. Geochem. 14, (1999). pp 835859.Google Scholar
4. Peterman, Z.E. and Wallin, B.. App. Geochem. 14, (1999) pp 939952.Google Scholar
5. Landström, O. and Tullborg, E.-L., Report No. SKB TR–95–13. (1995).Google Scholar
6. Tullborg, E.-L.. PhD Thesis A17 Geoscience Center. Göteborg University (1997)Google Scholar
7. Wallin, B. and Peterman, Z. E.. App. Geochem. 14, (1999) pp 953962.Google Scholar
8. Tullborg, E.-L., Landström, O and Wallin, B.. Chem. Geol 157, (1999) ppl99218.Google Scholar
9. Bath, A., Milodowski, A.E., Ruotsalainen, P., Tullborg, E.-L., Cortés Ruiz, A., and Aranyossy, J.-F. EUR 19613 EN, European Commission, Nuclear Science and Technology (2000). p. 157.Google Scholar
10. Milodowski, A. E., Gillespie, M. R., Pearce, J. M., and Metcalfe, R.. WG/98/45C, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham. (1998)Google Scholar