Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:58:00.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Novel Interconnect Design with High Stretchability and Fine Pitch Capability for Applications in Stretchable Electronics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yung-Yu Hsu
Affiliation:
[email protected]@gmail.com, IMEC, INTPAC, Leuven, Belgium
Mario Gonzalez
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, INTPAC, Leuven, Belgium
Frederick Bossuyt
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
Fabrice Axisa
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
Jan Vanfleteren
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
Ingrid De Wolf
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, INTPAC, Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Large area deformable macroelectronics, such as flexible display, smart bandage, electronic textile, have to withstand various modes of deformation (e.g., bending, twisting and stretching). Such electronic systems usually are composed of inorganic parts with limited deformability, and organic parts which can sustain large deformations. Because of the elastic nature of elastomers, these materials are often used as substrates for the specific applications mentioned above. In order to fulfill the demand of deformability, many concepts have been developed. One of these concepts consists of small rigid islands with active devices or individual thin chips which are interconnected by thin metal conductor lines. All rigid components are placed on the small islands to ensure that the strains acting on these brittle components are small when the structure is subjected to a large deformation. Since the thin conductor lines have to withstand all these deformations, a proper structural design is necessary to avoid losing structural integrity and electrical functionality during this deformation. Several technologies have been proposed in recent years, such as in-plane patterned metal conductors, out-of-plane wrinkling metal films, and conductive polymers or liquid alloys. It has been reported that by depositing a thin metal strip with a thickness of few nanometers on an elastomeric substrate, the elongation of the metal can go up to 50% while the strip remains conductive. Upon large strain, the elastic deformation of the elastomeric substrate causes local debondings of the metal film coevolving with strain localizations. Thanks to this coevolved process, even a �straight� line, deposited on a polymer substrate, is stretchable. However, a drawback of this unique characteristic is that the resistance of the thin metal film changes with elongation, which might be a disadvantage for certain applications. Another approach for having a stable resistance is to use bulk metal conductors. Compared to a freestanding bulk metal straight line which ruptures at strains of 1%˜2%, an in-plane patterned horseshoe metal conductor can be stretched up to 100% with a stable resistance before electrical failure. This paper demonstrates a novel in-plane patterned zigzag structure, with resistance independent of elongation before metal rupture, which can be stretched beyond 40%. The advantage compared to the horseshoe is that due to the geometrical design, the in-plane zigzag structural interconnects can be applied in a fine pitch microelectronic device. The experimental observations by both scanning electron microscopy micrographs and resistance measurements show that there is no significant local necking in either the transverse or the thickness direction at the metal breakdown area. Micrographs and simulation results show that a debonding occurs due to the local twisting of a metal interconnect, out-of-plane peeling and strain localized at the crest of a zigzag structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gray, D. S., Tien, J., Chen, C. S., Adv. Mater. 16, 5, 393397, (2004).10.1002/adma.200306107Google Scholar
2 Lacour, S. P., Wagner, S., Huang, Z., Suo, Z., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 15, 24042406, (2003).10.1063/1.1565683Google Scholar
3 Deshpande, S. D., Kim, J., Yun, S. R., Smart Mater. Struct., 14, 876880, (2005).10.1088/0964-1726/14/4/048Google Scholar
4 Kim, H. J., Son, C., Ziaie, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 011904, (2008).10.1063/1.2829595Google Scholar
5 Xiang, Y., Li, T., Suo, Z., Vlassak, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 161910, (2005).10.1063/1.2108110Google Scholar
6 Gonzalez, M., Axisa, F., Bulcke, M. Vanden, Brosteaux, D., Vandevelde, B., Vanfleteren, J., Microelectronics Reliability 48, 825832, (2008).10.1016/j.microrel.2008.03.025Google Scholar