Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-28T14:01:50.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling of Fly Ash Concrete Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Elizabeth L. White
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 also affiliated with the Department of Civil Engineering
Della M. Roy
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 also affiliated with the Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Get access

Abstract

A Factor Analysis Model was applied to existing literature data on fly ash and cement properties to relate them to the strength and durability of the cured pozzolanic concrete products. A normal curve was fitted to each independent fly ash and cement property and to each dependent strength property. Functions of the moments, such as indicators of skewness and kurtosis of each property, were calculated and the significance of their departures from the expected values of a normal population was examined. About one-half of the properties were log-normally distributed; the remainder were normally distributed as given. A predictive model was proposed for compressive strength, using the percent sulfate as representative of Factor I, the cement quantity as representative of Factor II, and the percent Fe2O3 as representative of Factor III.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

a. Yamato, T. and Sugita, H., in Proc. CANMET/ACI First Int. Conf. on the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Other Mineral By-products in Concrete, edited by Malhotra, V.M. (Amer. Concrete Inst. Pub. SP-79, 1983), p. 87.Google Scholar
b. Hague, M.N., Langan, B.W. and Ward, M.A., J. ACI 81, 54 (1984).Google Scholar
c. Yamoto, Y. and Kobayashi, M., Concrete Internat. (1982), p. 33.Google Scholar
d. Carette, G.G., Painter, K.E. and Malhotra, V.M., Concrete Int., p. 41 (1982).Google Scholar
e. Cook, J.E.C., Concrete Int., p. 72 (1982).Google Scholar
f. Kobayashi, M. and Sato, T., Japan-U.S. Science Seminar (1979).Google Scholar
g. Joshi, R.C., Carette, G.G. and Malhotra, V.M., in Proc. CANMET/ACI First Int. Conf. on the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Other Mineral Byproducts in Concrete, edited by Malhotra, V.M. (Amer. Concrete Inst. Pub. SP-79, 1983).Google Scholar
h. Carino, N.J., NBSIR 81–2244, Nat. Bur. Standards (1981).Google Scholar
i. Nat. Building Res. Inst., Second Interim Rept., (1980/1981).Google Scholar
1. Lamond, J.F., in Proc. CANMET/ACI First Int. Conf. on the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Other Mineral By-Products in Concrete, edited by Malhotra, V.M. (Amer. Concrete Inst. Pub. SP-79, 1983) p. 47.Google Scholar
2. White, E.L., Water Resources Bull. 11, 676687 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Shaw, D., NORMSTAT Computer Program, Dept. of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, C.S.I.R.O., Sydney, Australia, (modified by Griffiths, J.C., 1970).Google Scholar
4. Pearson, E.S. and Hartley, H.O., Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, 3rd Ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966). 263pp.Google Scholar
5. White, E.L., Devine, S., Roy, D.M., Licastro, P.H. and Cady, P.D. (in preparation).Google Scholar
6. Dunstan, E.R., in Performance of Lignite and Subbituminous Fly Ash in Concrete - A Progress Rept. (Bur. of Reclamation, Denver, 1976) 23 pp.Google Scholar
7. Dunstan, E.R., personal communication.,Google Scholar
8. Nat. Building Research Institute, in Second Interim Report on Studies of South African Pulverized Fuel Ash (PFA) for Use in Mortar and Concrete, (1980/1981 Financial Year), 39pp.Google Scholar
9. Majko, R.M. and Pistilli, M.F., personal communication.Google Scholar