Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T18:36:54.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Properties of Alumina Films Sputtered Over Steps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

C. A. Ross
Affiliation:
Komag Inc., 275 S. Hillview Drive, Milpitas, CA 95035
J. J. Barrese
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

The properties of sputtered films are strongly affected by the topography of the underlying substrate, due to the dependence of film growth and resputtering yield on the angle of incidence of the sputtered material and other species from the plasma. Thick r.f.-sputtered alumina films were deposited with different levels of substrate bias onto substrates into which parallel grooves had been cut. The alumina sputtered in the vicinity of the grooves forms well-defined regions with a lower incorporated argon content than the alumina sputtered onto the planar parts of the substrate. The ratio of compressive stress perpendicular to the grooves compared to the stress parallel to the grooves varies from 0.85 at zero substrate bias and 0.5 at biases of -50V and -100V. Comparing with finite element simulations, these ratios suggest that in the biased samples, the material near the steps has a lower level of compressive intrinsic stress than exists in the planar material. Nanoindentation was used to measure the modulus and hardness of the material near the steps and on the planar areas of the substrate. The alumina has an indentation modulus of 150 – 200 GPa and a hardness of 8 – 10 GPa, depending on its proximity to the grooves and on the substrate bias.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Salama, C A T., J. Electrochem. Soc. 117 (1970) 913 Google Scholar
2 Kennedy, T.N., Electronic Packaging and Production 14 (1974) 136 Google Scholar
3 Gardner, R.A., Peterson, P.J. and Kennedy, T.N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14 (1977) 1139 Google Scholar
4 Mantyla, T.A., Vuoristo, P.J.M., Telama, A.R. and Kettunen, P.O., Thin Solid Films 126 (1985) 43 Google Scholar
5 Nowicki, R.S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14 (1977) 127 Google Scholar
6 Roth, T., Kloos, K.H. and Broszeit, E., Thin Solid Films 153 (1987) 123 Google Scholar
7 Roth, T., Broszeit, E. and Kloos, K.H., Thin Solid Films 155 (1988) 801 Google Scholar
8 Bhatia, C.S., Guthmiller, G. and Spool, A.M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7 (1989) 1298 Google Scholar
9 Chou, T.C., Nieh, T.G., McAdams, S.G. and Pharr, G.M., Scripta Met. Mat. 25 (1991) 2203 Google Scholar
10 Ross, CA. and Malmhall, R., Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Magnetic Materials, Processes and Devices, ed Romankiw, L.T. and Herman, D.A., Electrochem. Soc, Pennington NJ, vol. PV94 6 (1994) 165 Google Scholar
11 Kennedy, T.N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 13 (1976) 1135 Google Scholar
12 Ting, C.Y., Vivalda, V.J. and Schaefer, H.G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 15 (1978) 1105 Google Scholar
13 Tait, R.N., Smy, T. and Brett, M.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8 (1990) 1593 Google Scholar
14 Dew, S.K., Smy, T., Tait, R.N. and Brett, M.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A9 (1991) 519 Google Scholar
15 Ross, CA. and Barrese, J.J., Proc. Mater. Res. Soc 308 (1993) 595 Google Scholar
16 Mattox, D.M. and Kominiak, G.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 9 (1971) 528 Google Scholar
17 Bland, R.D., Kominiak, G.J. and Mattox, D.M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11 (1974) 671 Google Scholar
18 Window, B. and Harding, G.L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A11 (1993) 1447 Google Scholar
19 d’Heurle, F.M., Metall. Trans. 1 (1970) 725 Google Scholar
20 Vuoristo, P.M.J., Mantyla, T., Kettunen, P. and Lappalainen, S., Thin Solid Films 204 (1991) 297 Google Scholar
21 Perry, A.J., Sartwell, B.D., Valvoda, V., Rafaja, D., Williamson, D.L. and Nelson, A.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A10 (1992) 1446 Google Scholar