Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:14:47.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Temperature Epitaxial Growth of Al on Si( 111) and CaF2(111) Using Molecular Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C.-C. Cho
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Texas Instruments, P.O. Box 655936, MS 147, Dallas, Texas 75265
H.-Y. Liu
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Texas Instruments, P.O. Box 655936, MS 147, Dallas, Texas 75265
Get access

Abstract

Using molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), we have grown high quality, low stress, single crystal Al on Si( 111) and CaF2(111). X-ray diffraction was used to characterize the crystalline quality, stress, and epitaxial relations of the films. AI(lll) was grown at a substrate temperature as low as 25°C on as-deposited CaF2(111) and Si(111) cleaned by either wet etching or high temperature annealing. Aluminum Film stresses, derived from deformation of the Al atomic planes, are compressive when the films are grown at low temperatures. The stress becomes tensile and increases as the growth temperature increases. Consequently, films of low stress can be achieved by choosing the appropriate growth temperature. Epitaxial relations are dependent on the growth temperature and Si substrate preparation methods. Aluminum films with crystalline orientations identical to the substrates (A type), rotated 180° about the surface normal of the substrates (B type), and mixed A and B types have been observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shingubara, S. and Nakasaki, Y.. Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 42 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Yamada, I. and Takagi, T., IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev., ED–34, 1018 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Ignat'ev, A. S., Mokerov, V. G., Petrova, A. G., Rybin, A. V. and Manzha, N. M., Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett., 8, 174 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Yamada, I., Inokawa, H. and Takagi, T., J. Appl. Phys., 56, 2746 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brillson, L.J., Slade, M.L., Katnani, A.D., Kelly, M. and Margaritondo, G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 44, 110 (1984).Google Scholar
6. LeGoues, F.K., Krakow, W. and Ho, P.S. in Layered Structures. Epitaxy. and Interfaces edited by Gibson, J.M. and Dawson, L.R., (Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc., 23, Pittsburgh, PA 1985) pp. 395400; Phylos. Mag., A 53, 833 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Jin, H.-S., Yaosir, A.S., Lu, T.-M., Gibson, W.M., Yamada, I. and Takagi, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 50, 1062 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Choi, C.-H., Harper, R.A., Yapsir, A.S. and Lu, T.-M., Appl. Phy. Lett., 51, 1992 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hasan, M.-A., Radnoczi, G., Sundgren, J.-E. and Hansson, G.V., Surf. Sci., 236, 53 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Kobayashi, T., Sekiguchi, A. and Hosokawa, N., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 27, L1775 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Schowalter, L.J. and Fathauer, R.W., CRC Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, 15, 367 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Hashimoto, S., Peng, J.L., Gibson, W.M., Schowalter, L.J. and Fathauer, R.W., Appl. Phys. Lett., 47, 1071 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Cho, C.-C., Liu, H.-Y., Gnade, B.E. and Chen, C.-E., Extended Abstracts of the 22nd Conference on Solid State Device and Materials, Sendai, pp. 1167 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Liu, H.-Y. and Cho, C.-C., in this MRS symposium proceeding.Google Scholar