Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T01:45:30.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion Damage Studies in GaAs-Algaas Ultra-Narrow Wires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

T. L. Cheeks
Affiliation:
Bellcore, 331 Newman Springs Rd., Red Bank, N.J. 07701
M. L. Roukes
Affiliation:
Bellcore, 331 Newman Springs Rd., Red Bank, N.J. 07701
A. Scherer
Affiliation:
Bellcore, 331 Newman Springs Rd., Red Bank, N.J. 07701
B. P. Van Der Gaag
Affiliation:
Bellcore, 331 Newman Springs Rd., Red Bank, N.J. 07701
H. G. Craighead
Affiliation:
Bellcore, 331 Newman Springs Rd., Red Bank, N.J. 07701
Get access

Abstract

Low energy ion damage effects have been investigated in GaAs-A1GaAs two dimensional electron gas (2DEG) materials. The effect of ion mass (He, Ar, Xe) and adsorbed C12 on the charge carrier density and mobility has been studied for ion bombarded 2DEG systems. The 2DEG mobility was significantly reduced by ion damage with the effect becoming more dramatic with smaller ion mass. For the same treatment, the two dimensional carrier density was relatively unaffected. The results of He ion exposure showed serious degradation of the 2DEG with moderate ion dose. Electrical measurements were performed to determine the conducting widths of narrow patterned wires. For the same structural widths (mask width) He defined wires showed smaller electrical widths than Ar milling in the presence of chlorine. Serious limitations to patterning small structures may be imposed using beam processes that include He or other light mass species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pang, S.W., Lincoln, G.A., McClelland, R.W., DeGraff, P.D., Geis, M.W. and Piacentini, W.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B1, 1334 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Pang, S. W., Geis, M.W., Efremow, N.N. and Lincoln, G.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B3, 398 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Roukes, M.L., Scherer, A., Allen, S.J. Jr., Craighead, H.G., Ruthen, R.M., Beebe, E.D., and Harbison, J.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 3011 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Scherer, A., Roukes, M.L., Craighead, H.G., Ruthen, R.M., Beebe, E.D., and Harbison, J.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 2133 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Scherer, A. and Roukes, M.L. (unpublished).Google Scholar
6. Cheeks, T.L. et. al. (unpublished).Google Scholar
7. Cheeks, T.L., Roukes, M.L., Scherer, A. and Craighead, H.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1969 (1988).Google Scholar