Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:22:55.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HRLEED and STM Study of Misoriented Si (100) with and without a Te Overlayer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Salima Yala
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL 60439, [email protected]
Pedro A. Montano
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL
Get access

Abstract

The growth of high quality Te on misoriented Si(100) is important as an intermediate phase for epitaxial growth of CdTe. The misorientation angle plays a key role in the growth quality of CdTe/Si(100); this incited our curiosity to investigate the effect of the misorientation angle on the topography of the surface structure of Si(100). Our main goal is to show the relation between the misorientation angle, the terrace width and the step height distributions. HRLEED ( High Resolution Low Energy Electron Diffraction ) provides information in reciprocal space while STM gives real space topographic images of the surface structure. STM and HRLEED measurements were performed on Si(100) with misorientation angle υ= 0.5°, 1.5° and 8° towards the ]110] direction and υ= 4° towards the ]130] direction. Except for the 8° misorientation in which case a regular step array with diatomic step height was observed, for the other misorientations the terrace width was variable. The average terrace width decreased with increasing misorientation angle. A mixture of diatomic and monatomic step heights was observed on the 0.5° and 1.5° misoriented Si(100) samples. It proves that one can not assume purely monatomic step height for low misorientation angles. Our results do not agree with the belief that at low miscut angle A and B terraces are equal and that as the misorientation angle increases the B terrace tends to be wider than the A terrace. In fact, pairing of terraces was not observed at all. Te was deposited at a substrate temperature of 200 C. We observed a significant reduction in the terrace widths for all miscut angles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lo, Y., Bicknell, R.N., Myers, T.H., Schetzina, J.F., J. Appl. Phys. 54,4238 (1983).Google Scholar
2 Sporken, R., Sivananthan, S., Mahavadi, K.K., Monfroy, G., Boukerche, M., Faurie, J.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55,1879 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Chen, Y.P., Ph.D. Thesis Chicago (1995).Google Scholar
4 Gronwald, K.D., Henzler, M., Surface Sci. 117,180 (1982).Google Scholar
5 Sheithauer, U., Meyer, G., Henzler, M., Surface Sci. 178,441 (1986).Google Scholar
6 Chen, C.J., Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy, Oxford Series in Optical and Imaging SciencesGoogle Scholar
7 Besocke, K., Wagner, H., Surface Sci. 52,653 (1975).Google Scholar
8 Lu, T.M., Lagally, M.G., Surface Sci. 120,47 (1982).Google Scholar
9 Heun, S., Falta, J., Henzler, M., Surface Sci. 243,132 (1991).Google Scholar
10 Niehus, H., Kohler, U.K., Copel, M., Demuth, J.E., J. Microscopy 152,735 (1988).Google Scholar