Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:28:33.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High throughput synthesis of ceramic nanofibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

S. Sood
Affiliation:
Department of materials science and engineering, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-2275
G. Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of materials science and engineering, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-2275
P. Gouma
Affiliation:
Department of materials science and engineering, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-2275
Get access

Abstract

High yield nanomanufacturing is important to turning nanotechnology advances into industrial products. Electrospinning is a nanomanufacturing process that has been used to process advanced ceramic nanofibers suitable for functional applications in sensing and catalysis, yet it has been limited in its scalability thus far. In this study a novel design of the electrospinning process and related equipment that could produce large qualities of ceramic nanofibers is described. This scaled-up approach to traditional needle electrospinning allows the formation of 24 jets operating under the same conditions as those set in the single jet lab-based process. Due to a thin metallic disc design, with tiny (0.5mm) holes drilled at the bottom corner of the disc, all jets experience a uniform impact of the electrostatic field. Continuous replenishment of the source disk at higher flow rates allows for high yields of nanofibers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sawicka, K. and Gouma, P. I.. J. Nanoparticle Research, 8(6), pp. 769781, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozza, Erika Simona, Bruzzo, Valentina, Carniato, Fabio, Marsano, Enrico, and Monticelli, Orietta. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 4 (2), 604-607 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sood, S., Divya, S., Gouma, P., Journal of nanoengineering and nanomanufacturing 4, 16, (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouma, P., Kalyanasundaram, K., and Bishop, A.. Journal of Materials Research, Nanowires and Nanotubes special issue 21(11), 29042910, 2006.Google Scholar
Thoppey, N M, R Bochinski, J, I Clarke, L and E Gorga, R. Nanotechnology 22, 345301(2011).http://iopscience.iop.org/0957-4484/22/34/345301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, B., Kimura, E., Sato, T., Fujita, S., Shiratori, S.. Polymer 45, 1895(2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theron, S. A., Yarin, A. L., Zussman, E., Kroll, E.. Polymer 46, 2889(2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Niu, H., Lin, T., Wang, X.. Polym. Eng. Sci. 49, 1582(2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarin, A. L., Zussman, E.. Polymer 45, 2977(2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouma, P., Kalyanasundaram, K., Yun, X., Stanacevic, M. and Wang, L.. IEEE Sensors Special Issue on Breath Analysis 10 (1), 4953(2010).Google Scholar