Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:44:28.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of Se+ Implanted and Annealed GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

D.K. Sadana
Affiliation:
Materials and Molecular Research Divisions, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; Now at Microelectronics Center of North Carolina, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
T. Sands
Affiliation:
Materials and Molecular Research Divisions, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
J. Washburn
Affiliation:
Materials and Molecular Research Divisions, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
Get access

Abstract

High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) has been applied to the study of amorphization and recrystallization mechanisms in Se+ implanted (100) GaAs. An Se+ dose of 1 × 1014 cm−2 at 450 keV (projected range 1550Å) produced an amorphous band in the depth range 250 to 2150Å below the surface. Annealing at 400°C resulted in the epitaxial regrowth of the upper and lower transition region (0–250Å and 2150 – 2500Å, respectively). Regrowth of the amorphous layer was found to proceed by the nucleation and propagation of the dense network of stacking faults bundles. These bundles disappeared on higher ≥600°C) temperature annealing. Amorphization and recrystallization mechanisms in Se+ implanted GaAs are discussed in light of these HRTEM results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Narayanan, G.H. and Kachare, A., Phys. Status Solidi 26 657 (1974).Google Scholar
2. Gamo, K., Ineda, T., Mayer, J.W., Eisen, F.H. and Rhodes, G.G., Rad. Eff. 33 85 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Sadana, D.K. and Booker, G.R., Rad. Eff. 42 35 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Kular, S.S., Sealy, B.J., Stephens, K.G., Sadana, D. and Booker, G.R., Solid State Electron 23 831 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Williams, J.S. and Austin, M.W., App. Phys. Lett. 36 994 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Grimaldi, M.G., Paine, B.M., Nicolet, M-A. and Sadana, D.K., J. App. Phy. 53 1803 (1982)Google Scholar
7. Bhattacharya, R.S., Rai, A.K., Pronko, P.P., Narayan, J., Ling, S.C. and Wilson, S.R., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 44 61 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Kular, S.S., Sealy, B.J. and Stephens, K.G., Elec. Lett. 14 22 (1977).Google Scholar
9. Sadana, D.K., Booker, G.R., Sealy, B.J., Stephens, K.C. and Badawi, M.M., Rad. Eff. 49 183 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Sadana, D.K., Sands, T. and Washburn, J. (paper submitted to App. Phys. Lett.).Google Scholar
11. Sands, T., Sadana, D.K., Washburn, J. and Gronsky, R., (unpublished).Google Scholar
12. Washburn, J., Murty, C.S., Sadana, D., Byrne, P., Gronsky, R., Cheung, N. and Kilaas, R., Nucl. Inst. & Meth. 209/210 345 (1983).Google Scholar