Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T06:31:18.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth of Epitaxial IrSi3 Layers on Si(111)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

T. L. Lin
Affiliation:
Center for Space Microelectronics Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109
C. W. Nieh
Affiliation:
Keck Laboratory of Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 Present address: Hughes Research Laboratories, 3011 Malibu Canyon Road, Malibu, Ca 90265
Get access

Abstract

Epitaxial IrSi3 films have been grown on Si (111) by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) at temperatures ranging from 630 to 800 °C and by solid phase epitaxy (SPE) at 500 °C. Good surface morphology was observed for IrSi3 layers grown by MBE at temperatures below 680 °C, and an increasing tendency to form islands is noted in samples grown at higher temperatures. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis reveals that the IrSi3 layers grow epitaxially on Si(111) with three epitaxial modes depending on the growth conditions. For IrSi3 layers grown by MBE at 630 °C, two epitaxial modes were observed with ~ 50% area coverage for each mode. Single mode epitaxial growth was achieved at a higher MBE growth temperature, but with island formation in the IrSi3 layer. A template technique was used with MBE to improve the IrSi3 surface morphology at higher growth temperatures. Furthermore, single-crystal IrSi3 was grown on Si(111) at 500 °C by SPE, with annealing performed in-situ in a TEM chamber.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Elliot, R. P., Constitution of Binary Alloys, first suppl. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
2Chu, J. J. and Chen, L. J., J. Appl. Phys., 63 (4), 1163 (1988)Google Scholar
3Petersson, S., Baglin, J., Hammer, W., D’Heurle, F., Kuan, T. S., Ohdomari, I., de Sousa Pires, J., and Tove, P., J. Appl. Phys., 50, 3357 (1979).Google Scholar
4Ohdomari, I., Kuan, T. S., and Tu, K. N., J. App. Phys., 50, 7020, 1979.Google Scholar
5Wittmer, M., Oelhafen, P., and Tu, K. N., Phys. Rev. B, 35, 9073 (1987).Google Scholar
6Grunthaner, P. J., Grunthaner, F. J., Fathauer, R. W., Lin., T. L., Schowengerdt, F. D., Pate, B., and Mazur, J. H., Proc. of 2nd International Symp. on Silicon Molecular Beam Epitaxy (The Electrochemical Society ECS), pp. 375, Oct., 1987.Google Scholar
7Lin, T. L., Fathauer, R. W. and Grunthaner, P. J., and d’Anterroches, C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 52, 804 (1988)Google Scholar