Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:33:46.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A General Analytical Solution for the Concentration Profiles of Ion-Exchanged Planar Waveguides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Xiaoming Li  and
Paul F. Johnson
Xiaoming Li
Affiliation:
R&D, Norton Company, 1 New Bond Street, Worcester, MA 01606
Paul F. Johnson
Affiliation:
New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802
Get access

Abstract

During the recent years, a great variety of ion-exchange processes, including one-step or two-step electric field assisted ion-exchange processes, have been developed to fabricate different kinds of passive planar glass waveguides, e.g., surface waveguides, which correspond to surface maximum concentration, or buried waveguides, which correspond to inside maximum concentration [1,2,3]. Theoretical calculation of ionic concentration distribution has been of interest since refractive index is generally a linear function of concentration. A general analytical solution to calculate both surface and buried concentration distributions from different ion-exchange processes, however, has not yet been presented. In addition, traditional ion-exchange has been carried out only with constant surface concentration boundary conditions. Little attention has been paid, either experimentally or theoretically, to ion-exchange processes with variable boundary conditions. In fact, the time-dependent surface concentration is experimentally observed for the ion-exchange of GRIN glass in molten salt bath [4]. Very recently, a novel one-step technique [5,6] involving electric field assisted ion-exchange of Na+ in glass by Ag+ from molten AgNO3 bath with decaying silver concentration has been developed to produce buried Ag+ concentration profiles in glass. As the accurate and reproducible processes are very important for fabricating ion-exchanged glass waveguides, theoretical modeling and analysis on the new process are needed.

In this paper, the one-dimensional field-assisted linear diffusion equation has been analytically solved by Laplace transformation to theoretically calculate concentration profiles produced by field enhanced ion-exchange process with exponentially decaying surface concentration boundary conditions. The applications of the solution to a variety of ion-exchange processes with different boundary or processing conditions for optical waveguide fabrication have been discussed. The theoretical results prove that the solution is a general analytical solution which can be used to calculate either surface concentration profiles or buried concentration profiles.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 244: Symposium J – Optical Waveguide Materials , 1991 , 357
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Izawa, T. and Nakagome, H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 21 584–6 (1972).10.1063/1.1654265Google Scholar
[2] Findakly, T., Optical Engineering, 24 244–50 (1985)10.1117/12.7973463Google Scholar
[3] Ramaswamy, R.V., and Srivastava, R., J. Lightwave Tech., 6 984–1002 (1988).10.1109/50.4090Google Scholar
[4] Houde-Walter, S.N. and Moore, D.T., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 99 104–112 (1988).Google Scholar
[5] Li, Xiaoming and Johnson, P.F., presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of Am. Ceram. Soc., Cincinnati, OH, April 28 - May 2, 1991 (to be published in Am. Ceram. Soc. Proceedings)Google Scholar
[6] Li, Xiaoming and Johnson, P.F., presented at the 7th International Conference on the Physics of Non-Crystalline Solids, Cambridge, England, August 4 – 9, 1991 (to be published in Soc. of Glass Technology Proceedings)Google Scholar
[7] Frischat, G.H., Ionic Diffusion in Oxide Glass. (Trans tech Publ. Bay Village, Ohio, 1975), pp.21–22,.Google Scholar
[8] Leil, M.A.E. and Cooper, A.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 62 (1979).Google Scholar
[9] Kaneko, T., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 18 1597–1607, (1985).10.1088/0022-3727/18/8/023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Ramaswamy, R.V. and Najafi, S.I., IEEE J. Quant. Elect. OE–22 883–91 (1986).Google Scholar
[11] Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, (Clarendon, Oxford, 1956), pp.17–23, pp.186–9.Google Scholar
[12] Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A., Handbook of Mathematical Funcations, (Dover, New York, 1965), Ch. 29.Google Scholar
[13] Kaneko, T. and Yamamoto, H., in Proc. 10th Int. Cong. on Glass. Part I, Kyoto, Japan, (1974) pp. 8–79– 8–86.Google Scholar
[14] Miliou, A., Zhengguang, H., Cheng, H.C., Srivastava, R., and Ramaswamy, R.V., IEEE J. Quantum electronics, OE–25, 1889–97 (1989).10.1109/3.34050Google Scholar
[15] Kaneko, T., J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 7 999–1002, (1988).10.1007/BF00720757Google Scholar
[16] Kaneko, T., Optics Comm., 52 17–23, (1984).10.1016/0030-4018(84)90066-XGoogle Scholar
[17] Najafi, S.I., Suchoski, P.G. Jr., and Ramaswamy, R.V., IEEE J. Quant. Elect. OE–22 2213–18 (1986).10.1109/JQE.1986.1072926Google Scholar
[18] Pantchev, B., Opt. Commun., 60 373–5 (1986).10.1016/0030-4018(86)90074-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Zhenguang, H., Srivastava, R. and Ramaswamy, R.V., Appl. Phys. Lett., 5 1681–2, (1988).10.1063/1.99796Google Scholar
[20] Lagu, R.K. and Ramaswamy, V., et.al,, Appl. Phys. Lett., 45 117–8 (1984); J. Lightwave Tech., LT-3, 763–6, (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar