Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:53:40.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Finite Element Study on the Nanoindentation of Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Xi Chen
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Joost J. Vlassak
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation is a technique commonly used for measuring thin film mechanical properties such as hardness and stiffness. Typically, shallow indentations with contact depths less than 10-20% of the film thickness are used to ensure that measurements are not affected by the presence of the substrate. In this study, we have used the finite element method to investigate the effect of substrate and pile-up on hardness and stiffness measurements of thin film systems. We find that: i) for soft films on hard substrates, the hardness is independent of the substrate as long as the indentation depth is less than 50% of the film thickness; ii) as soon as the hardness exceeds that of the substrate, the substrate effect becomes significant, even for indentations as shallow as 5% of the film thickness; iii) if the film is at least 40 times harder than the substrate, the plastic zone is mostly confined to the substrate while the film conforms to the deformed substrate by bending. We define a substrate effect factor and construct a map that may be useful in the interpretation of indentation measurements on thin films. It is found that the yield stress mismatch is a key factor characterizing the hardness of thin film system, and the elastic mismatch is important when making stiffness measurements. The results obtained in this study are very useful when it is difficult to avoid the influence of the substrate on the measurements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Tsui, T. Y., Vlassak, J. J., and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 14, 2196 (1999).Google Scholar
3. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Vickers Hardness of Metallic Materials (1987).Google Scholar
4. Field, J. S. and Swain, M. V., J. Mater. Res. 10, 101 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Hill, R., The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1950).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, K. L., Contact mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
7. Gao, H., Chiu, C-H., and Lee, J., Int. J. Solids Struct. 29, 2471 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Larsen, T. A. and Simo, J. C., J. Mater. Res. 7, 618 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Tsui, T. Y., Ross, C. A., and Pharr, G. M., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 473, 51 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Hay, J. C. and Pharr, G. M., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 505, 71 (1998).Google Scholar
11. Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorenson Inc., ABAQUS version 5.8 User's Manual (1999).Google Scholar
12. Mesarovic, S. D. and Fleck, N. A., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., in press.Google Scholar
13. McElhaney, K. W., Vlassak, J. J., and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 13, 1300 (1998).Google Scholar
14. Chen, X. and Vlassak, J. J., J. Mater. Res., submitted.Google Scholar