Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T18:56:44.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Extended Defect as a Mechanism for the Immobilization of HLW Species in Zirconolite, Perovskite and Hollandite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

T. J. White
T. J. White*
Affiliation:
School of Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia
Get access

Abstract

High resolution electron microscopy, analytical electron microscopy and selected area electron diffraction are used to establish the crystallochemical mechanisms by which simulated high level waste enters Synroc. It is shown that waste species are incorporated largely as a non-continuous solid solution. In other words, simple isomorphic substitution of waste elements in place of matrix cations, i.e. the classical continuous solid solution, does not operate (or is only significant at very low waste levels of radwaste). Usually, substitution is accompanied by the appearance of coherent extended defects which can take the form of antiphase boundaries, unit cell twinning (both mimetic and polysynthetic), or cation ordering. In this manner, a numb~er of closely related phases appear in response to variations in waste composition and loading. It is believed that the mechanism of structural modification will endow Synroc with considerable flexibility to respond to chemical changes in the wastestream. Other ceramic materials currently being evaluated as possible wasteforms (viz. sphene glass-ceramics and APO4 phosphates), are also likely to possess this capacity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 50: Symposium STOCKHOLM – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX , 1985 , 283
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ringwood, A.E., Oversby, V.M., Kesson, S.E., Sinclair, W., Ware, N., Hibberson, W., Major, A., Nucl. Chem. Waste Manage., 2, 287 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Cooper, J.A., Cousens, D.R., Lewis, R., Myhra, S., Segall, R.L., Smart, R.St.C., Turner, P.S., White, T.J., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 68, 64 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dosch, R.G., Headley, T.J., Hlava, P.F., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 67, 354 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Ware, W.G., Hibberson, W., Major, A., Nature, 278, 219 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Segall, R.L., Smart, R.St.C., Turner, P.S., White, T.J., these proceedings.Google Scholar
6. White, T.J., Segall, R.L., Turner, P.S., Angew. Chem., 97, 369 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Campbell, J., Hoenig, C., Bazan, F., Ryerson, F., Guinan, M., Van Konynenburg, R., Kozsa, R., LLRL Report No. UCKL-53240 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Rossell, H.J., Nature, 283, 282 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Gatehouse, B.M., Grey, I.E., Hill, R.J., Rossell, H.J., Acta Crystallogr., B37, 306 (1981).Google Scholar
10. White, T.J., Amer. Mineral., 69, 1156 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Kay, H.F. and Bailey, P.C., Acta Crystallogr., 10, 219 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. White, T.J., Segall, R.L., Barry, J.C., Hutchison, J.L., Acta Crystallogr., B41, 93 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Sinclair, W. and McLaughlin, G.M., Acta Crystallogr., B38, 245 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kesson, S.E. and White, T.J., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
15. Sabine, T.M. and Hewat, A.W., J. Nucl. Mat., 110, 173 (1982).Google Scholar
16. Kesson, S.E. and Ringwood, A.E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, VI, edited by McVay, G.C. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New Yok, 1984), pp 507–512.Google Scholar
17. Kesson, S.E., Sinclair, W.J., Ringwood, A.E., Nucl. Chem. Waste Manage., 4, 259 (1983).Google Scholar
18. Kesson, S.E. and Ringwood, A.E., Nucl. Chem. Waste Manage., 2, 53 (1981).Google Scholar
19. White, T.J., Segall, R.L., Hutchison, J.L., Barry, J.C., Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A392, 343 (1984).Google Scholar
20. Mazzi, F. and Munno, R., Am. Mineral., 68, 262 (1983).Google Scholar
21. Vance, E.R., Hayward, P.J., Cann, C.D., Mitchell, S.L., Stanchell, M.A.T., Wren, D.J., Glass Tech., 25, 232 (1984).Google Scholar
22. Higgins, J.B. and Ribbe, P.H., Amer. Mineral., 61, 878 (1976).Google Scholar
23. Aldred, A.T., in Geochemical Behaviour of Disposed Radioactive Waste, edited by Barney, G.S., Navratil, J.D. and Schultz, W.W.S. (American Ceramic Society, Columbus, 1984) pp 305–314.Google Scholar
24. Ewing, R.C. and Headley, T.J., J. Nucl. Mat., 119, 102 (1983).Google Scholar