Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-28T05:57:51.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epitaxial Growth and Structure of Highly Mismatched Oxide Films with Rock-salt Structure on MgO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. A. Langjahr
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut f'ir Metallforschung, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
T. Wagner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut f'ir Metallforschung, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
F. F. Lange
Affiliation:
Materials Department, College of Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Ca 93106, USA
M. Ruole
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut f'ir Metallforschung, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Get access

Abstract

CaO thin films were grown on (001) MgO single crystal substrates by a chemical solution deposition method to study the influence of a relatively high lattice mismatch (14%) on the epitaxial growth. In order to minimize an influence of a different crystal structure and chemistry between film and substrate, film and substrate were chosen to have the same structure (NaCl) and a similar chemistry. The films were heat treated until they broke up into single crystal islands on the MgO substrate. X-ray pole figure analysis and TEM observations of the CaO-films showed that most of the grains had a single out-of-plane orientation (111)CaO || (001)MgO, corresponding to two non-redundant, symmetry related in-plane variants [1 10](111)CaO || [110](001)MgO and [110](111)CaO || [110](001)MgO. A near coincidence site lattice (NCSL) model could be constructed for the interface, suggesting good lattice and charge matching for the observed orientation relations. The mechanisms and energetics leading to the experimentally observed orientation relations are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Matthews, J.W., in Dislocations in Solids, edited by Nabarro, F.R.N., vol.2 (North-Holland Publishing Company, 1979), pp. 461545.Google Scholar
2. Vook, R.W., International Metals Reviews 27, 209 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Takayanagi, K., Yagi, K., Honjo, R., Thin Solid Films 48, 137 (1978).Google Scholar
4. JCPDS file, # 4–835 (NiO), 4–829 (MgO), 9–402 (CoO), 7–230 (MnO), 5–640 (CdO), 37–1497 (CaO), 6–520 (SrO), 1–746 (BaO) (1992).Google Scholar
5. Mantese, J.V., Micheli, A.L., Hamdi, A.H. and Vest, R.W., MRS Bulletin XIV, 48 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Langjahr, P.A., Wagner, T., Riihle, M. and Lange, F.F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 401, 109 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Lange, F.F. in Proc. Recrystallization '92, edited by Fuentes, M. and Sevillano, J. Gil (Trans Tech Pubications, Germany, UK, USA, 1992).Google Scholar
8. Scientific Group Thermodata Europe (SGTE), Domanie Universitaire, BP66, 38402, St Martin d'Hères Cedex, France (1993).Google Scholar
9. Schroder, W., Z. Elektochem. 47, 196 (1941).Google Scholar
10. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 72nd edition, ed. by Lide, D.T. (CRC Press Inc. 1991), p. 14–11.Google Scholar
11. Heslop, R.B., Jones, K., Inorganic Chemistry (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1976).Google Scholar
12. Langjahr, P.A., Lange, F.F., Wagner, T. and Rifihle, M., to be published.Google Scholar
13. Miller, K.T., Lange, F.F., J. Mater. Res. 5, 151 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Thompson, C.V., Annu. Rev. Mat. Sci. 20, 245 (1990).Google Scholar
15. Kulish, U.M., Inorganic Materials 24, 467 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Mackrodt, W.C., Phys. Chem. Minerals 15, 228 (1988).Google Scholar
17. Mykura, H., Bansal, P.S. and Lewis, M. H., Phil. Mag. A 42, 225 (1980).Google Scholar
18. Taylor, D., Trans. Br. Ceram. Soc. 83, 5 (1984).Google Scholar
19. Jaeger, H., Sherwood, R.G., Japan. J. Appl. Phys. Suppl. 2(1), 297 (1974).Google Scholar
20. Gao, Y., Shewmon, P.G. and Dregia, S.A., Acta metall. 37, 3165 (1989).Google Scholar