Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:47:54.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy Release Due to Domain Formation in the Strained Epitaxy of Multivariant Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

W. Pompe
Affiliation:
Department of Materials.College of Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Also: Max-Planck Research Group “Mechanics of Heterogeneous Solids”, Dresden, Germany
X. Gong
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering College of Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Z. Suo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering College of Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
J.S. Speck
Affiliation:
Department of Materials.College of Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Get access

Abstract

Twin related domain formation is examined as a strain relaxation mechanism for a heteroepitaxial tetragonal film on a cubic substrate. Elastic relaxations are calculated for a single twin band in which the c-axis of the tetragonal domains is either related by a 90* rotation about an axis in the plane of the film or by a 90* rotation about the surface normal. In all cases, the strain energy change is evaluated for both the film and the substrate. A domain pattern map is developed that predicts single domain and multiple domain fields depending on the relative misfit strains and domain wall energy. The concept of a critical thickness, hc, for domain formation is developed. For cases in which the c-axis is rotated 90* about an axis in the plane of the film, the critical thickness depends only on the relative coherency strain between the substrate and film and the ratio of the domain wall energy to the stored elastic energy. For the case of a pattern consisting of energetically equivalent domains with the c-axis in plane, the equilibrium distance of multiple domains is derived. For such multiple domains, a minimum wall separation distance exists which depends non-linearly on the film thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cheung, J.T., Morgan, P.E.D., Lowndes, D.H., Zheng, X.-Y., and Breen, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., accepted for publication (1993).Google Scholar
2. Cheung, J.T., Morgan, P.E.D., and Neugaonkar, R., Integrated Ferro., accepted for publication (1993).Google Scholar
3. Ramesh, R., Chan, W.K., Wilkens, B., Gilchrist, H., Sands, T., Tarascon, J.M., Keramidas, V.G., Fork, D.K., Lee, J., and Safari, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 (1992) 1537.Google Scholar
4. Seifert, A., Speck, J.S., and Lange, F.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (1993) 443.Google Scholar
5. Hu, S.M., J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1979) 4661.Google Scholar
6. Freund, L.B., and Hu, Y., Shear Stress at a Film-Substrate Interface due to Mismatch Strain, (Office of Naval Research Contractor Report, 1988).Google Scholar
7. Timoshenko, S.P., and Goodier, J.N., Theory of Elasticity (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951).Google Scholar
8. Pompe, W., Gong, X., Suo, Z., and Speck, J.S., J. Appl. Phys., submitted for publication (1993).Google Scholar
9. Freund, L.B., MRS Bulletin 17 (1992) 52.Google Scholar
10. Hutchinson, J.W., and Suo, Z., Adv. Appl. Mech. 29 (1992) 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Roytburd, A.L., Mat. Res. Soc. Syrmp. Proc. 221 (1991) 256.Google Scholar