Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:56:36.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Silicic Acid, Aluminate Ion Activity And Hydrosilicate Gel Development on the Dissolution Rate of a Simulated British Magnox Waste Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. K. Abraitis ,
B. P. McGrail  and
D. P. Trivedi
P. K. Abraitis
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, U.K. M13 9PL ([email protected]).
B. P. McGrail
Affiliation:
Applied Geology and Geochemistry Department, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, U.S.A. WA 99352 ([email protected]).
D. P. Trivedi
Affiliation:
British Nuclear Fuels plc., Environmental Assessments, R002, Risley, Warrington, U.K. WA3 6AS ([email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

The dissolution rate of a simulated Magnox waste glass has been investigated in single-pass flow-through experiments designed to investigate the role of Al and Si in the dissolution process. The results indicate that both Al and Si species suppress the rate of dissolution. These effects may be modelled using a combined Al/Si affinity term in a conventional glass dissolution rate law. Aluminium species may also play an inhibitory role when present at relatively high solution activities. In Si-rich alkaline media, the concentration of aluminium is controlled to very low levels by the development of secondary aluminosilicate phases. Removal of Al by secondary phase precipitation results in dissolved Al activities below that required to reach ‘saturation’ with respect to the glass.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 401
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Lasaga, A. C. in Kinetics of Geochemical Processes ed. Lasaga, A. C. and Kirkpatrick, R. J., Reviews in Mineralogy 8, chapter 4, p. 135–169 (1981).Google Scholar
[2] Aagaard, P. and Helgeson, H. C., Am. J. Sci. 282 (1982) p. 237–285.Google Scholar
[3] Lasaga, A. C. in Chemical Weathering Rates of Silicate Minerals, eds. White, A. F. and Brantley, S. L., Reviews in Mineralogy 31, chapter 2, p. 23–81 (1995).Google Scholar
[4] Grambow, B., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. Vol.44 (1985), p. 209–216.Google Scholar
[5] Bourcier, W. L., Peiffer, D. W., Knauss, K. G., McKeegan, K. D. and Smith, D. K., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. Vol.176 (1990), p. 209–216.Google Scholar
[6] Gin, S., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. Vol.412 (1996), p. 189–196.Google Scholar
[7] Daux, V., Guy, C., Advocat, T., Crovisier, J. L. and Stille, P., Chemical Geology Vol.142 (1997) p. 109–126.Google Scholar
[8] Advocat, T., Chouchan, J. L., Crovisier, J. L., Guy, C., Daux, V., Jegou, C., Gin, S. and Vernaz, E., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. Vol.412 (1998), p. 63–70.Google Scholar
[9] McGrail, B. P., Ebert, W. L., Bakel, A. J. and Peeler, D. K., Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol.249 (1997), p. 175–189.Google Scholar
[10] ASTM, Standard Test Methods for Determining the Chemical Durability of Nuclear Waste Glasses: The Product Consistency Test (PCT), ASTM C 1285-94, Annual Book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia, PA (1994).Google Scholar
[11] Parkhurst, D. L., U. S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4227 (1995).Google Scholar
[12] Abraitis, P. K., Vaughan, D. J., Livens, F. R., Monteith, J., Tnivedi, D. P. and Small, J. S., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. Vol.412 (1998), p. 47–54.Google Scholar
[13] Smith, B. F. L. in Clay Mineralogy: Spectroscopic and Chemical Determinative Methods. ed. Wilson, M. J., chapter 9, p. 331-357(1994).Google Scholar
[14] Iseghem, P. Van, Amaya, T., Suzuki, Y. and Yamamoto, H., Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol.190 (1992), p. 269–276.Google Scholar