Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T13:02:24.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Ion Implantation on Protein Adsorption onto Silicone Rubber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Yoshiaki Suzuki ,
Masahiro Kusakabe ,
Masaya Iwaki ,
Kiyoko Kusakabe ,
Hiromichi Akiba  and
Masaaki Suzuki
Yoshiaki Suzuki
Affiliation:
Erumo Corporation. Obushi 2656-1, Fuji, Shizouka 417, Japan
Masahiro Kusakabe
Affiliation:
Erumo Corporation. Obushi 2656-1, Fuji, Shizouka 417, Japan
Masaya Iwaki
Affiliation:
Riken Hirosawa 2-1, Wako, Saitama, 351-01, Japan
Kiyoko Kusakabe
Affiliation:
Tokyo Women's Medical College, Shinjuku-ku Tokyo, 162, Japan
Hiromichi Akiba
Affiliation:
Tokyo Women's Medical College, Shinjuku-ku Tokyo, 162, Japan
Masaaki Suzuki
Affiliation:
Government Industrial Development Laboratory Hokkaido, Toyohira-ku,061-01, Japan
Get access

Abstract

A study has been made on the surface wettability, atomic ratio, chemical structure, chemical bonding states and plasma protein adsorption of ion implanted silicone rubbers. C+-, N2+-, 02+-, Ar+- and Na+-ion implantations were performed at an energy of 150 keV at room temperature. The doses ranged from 1x1012 to 1x1017 ions/cm2. Ion implantation caused the surface roughness to increase by 1–5 times. Surface wettability was estimated by means of a sessile drop method using water. With increasing ion dose, the contact angle of water decreased from 98.9° to 48.5°. However, if the sample was in the air, the contact angle of water returned to its initial valve in time elapsed. The results of XPS measurements showed that implanted elements were incorporated in a gaussian like distribution and host elements were redistributed in the polymer matrix. No change of binding energies of 01s, CIS, Si2p and Si2p can be observed upon ion implantation. Results of FT-IR-ATR showed that C+-, N2+-, 02+-, and Ar+-ion implantation decomposed the original chemical bonds to form the new radicals. The amounts of new radicals are related to doses of implanted ions. In contrast, Na+-ion implantation hardly formed new radicals. The amount of albumin adsorbed onto 02+-, Ar+-, N2+-, and C+- ion implanted silicone is less than that on unimplanted specimens, but more fibrinogen is adsorbed. Na+-ion implantation produced an increase in the amount of adsorbed albumin as the dose increased. In summary, Na+ion implantation produces effects that are attributable to the additional implanted constituent in the surface of the silicone, and 02+-, N2+-, C+-, and Ar+-ion implantations primarily cause radiation effects on silicone rubber.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 110: Symposium M – Biomedical Materials and Devices , 1987 , 669
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Mason, R.G., Progress in Hemostasis Thrombosis, Vol.1, Spaet, T.H., Ed. Grune & Stratton, New York, 1972, pp 141–164.Google Scholar
[2] Bair, R.E. and Dutton, R.C., J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 3, 191–206 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Suzuki, M., Kishida, A., Iwata, H. and Ikada, Y., Macromolecules, 19 (1986) 1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Iwaki, M., Mater. Sci. Eng., 90 (1987) 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Takahashi, K., Ikabe, Y. and Iwaki, M., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., 182/183 (1981) 1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Mazorek, H., Day, D.R., Maby, E.W., Abel, J.S., Senturia, S.D., Dresselhaus, M.S. and Dresselhause, G., J. Poly. Sci.: Polym. Phys. Ed. 21, (1983)537.Google Scholar
[7] Yoshida, K. and Iwaki, M., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B19/20 (1987)878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Vroman, L., Adams, A.L., and Klings, M., Federation Proceedings., Vol.130, No. 5, pp 1494–1502 (1971).Google Scholar
[9] Bang, N.U., Heindreich, R.O., and Trygstad, C.W., Ann. N. Y. Zcad. Sci. No. 201, pp 280–299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Randy Lee, G., and Kim, Sung, Wam,J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Vol.8, pp 251–256 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Brash, J.L., Uniyal, S., and Samak, Q., Trans. Amer. Soc. Artif. Int. Organs. Vol.20, pp 69–76 (1974).Google Scholar
[12] Brash, J.L. and Uniyal, S., Trans. Amer. Soc. Artif. Int. Organs. Vol.22, pp 253–259 (1976)Google Scholar
[13] Hanson, Chuang, Y.K., King, W.F., and Mason, R.G., J. Lab. Clin. Med, Vol.92, No. 3, pp 483–496 (1976)Google Scholar
[14] Ihlenfelt, J.V., Mathis, T.R., Barber, T.A., Mosher, D.F., Riddle, L.M., Hart, A.P., Updike, S.J., and Cooper, S.L., Trans. Amer. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, Vol.24, pp 727–735 (1978)Google Scholar
[15] Ihlenfeid, J.V. and Cooper, S.L., J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Vol.13, pp 577–591 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Baskin, A., and Lyman, D.J., J. Biomed. Mater. Res, Vol.14, pp 393–403 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Young, B.R., Lambrecht, L.K., Albrecht, R.M., Moster, D.F., and Cooper, s.L., Trans. Amer. Soc. Artif. Inter. Organs, Vol 29, pp 443–447 (1983)Google Scholar
[18] Suzuki, Y., Kokoyama, Y., Kusakabe, M., Kusakabe, K., Akiba, H., and Sato, S., Jpn. J. Artif. Organs, Vol.14, No. 2, pp 762–765 (1985)Google Scholar
[19] Suzuki, Y., Kusakabe, M., Kusakabe, K., Akiba, H., and Sato, S., Jpn. J. Artif. Organs, Vol.15, No. 1, pp 235 (1986)Google Scholar
[20] Suzuki, Y., Kusakabe, K., Iwaki, M., Kusakabe, K., Akiba, H., Sato, S., Jpn, J. Artif. Organs, Vol.16, No. 3, pp 1341–1344, (1987)Google Scholar
[21] McFarlane, A.S., J. Clin. Inves, Vol.42, No. 3, pp 346–361 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Grant, W.H., Smith, L.E., and Stromberg, R.R., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. No. 8, pp 33–38 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Suzuki, Y., Kusakabe, M., Takahashi, K., Iwaki, M., Yoshida, K., Ishitani, A., and Suzuki, M., Polymer Preprints Jpn, Vol.36, No. 8, pp 2276–2278 Google Scholar
[24] Suzuki, Y., Kusakabe, M., Takahashi, K., Iwaki, M., Yoshida, K., Ishitani, A., and Suzuki, M., Polymer Preprints Jpn, Vol.36, No. 8, pp 2276–2278 (1987)Google Scholar