Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:49:43.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the Composition of Nickel Alloys on the Anodic Behavior in Aqueous Solutions of Chloride and Bicarbonate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2012

Natalia S. Zadorozne ,
Ricardo M. Carranza ,
Mabel C. Giordano ,
Alicia E. Ares  and
Raul B. Rebak
Natalia S. Zadorozne
Affiliation:
CONICET, Argentina.
Ricardo M. Carranza
Affiliation:
Departamento Materiales, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Argentina. Instituto Sabato, UNSAM / CNEA, Argentina.
Mabel C. Giordano
Affiliation:
Departamento Materiales, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Argentina. Instituto Sabato, UNSAM / CNEA, Argentina.
Alicia E. Ares
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina
Raul B. Rebak
Affiliation:
GE Global Research, Schenectady, NY, USA.
Get access

Abstract

The stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of Alloy 22 in concentrated ground waters was associated to the presence of bicarbonate and chloride ions in the water. SCC occurred when an anodic peak appeared in the polarization curve of Alloy 22. The aim of this work was to investigate further which element in Alloy 22 was responsible for the anodic peak and therefore SCC. Four alloys (22, 800H, 600 and 201) were mainly used for this study. It has been found that Alloy 22, 600 and 800H show anodic peaks; which are affected by chloride and temperature. It is likely that the anodic peak is associated to the presence of either chromium, molybdenum or both.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1475: Symposium NW – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXV , 2012 , imrc11-1475-nw35-p70
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gordon, G.M., “Corrosion Considerations Related to Permanent Disposal of High-. Level Radioactive Waste,” Corrosion, 58, No.10, 811(2002)10.5006/1.3287662Google Scholar
2. Cragnolino, G. A., Dunn, D. S., and Pan, Y.-M., “Localized corrosion susceptibility of alloy 22 as a waste package container material,” in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , Vol. 713, pp. 53–60 (Warrendale, PA: Materials Research Society 2002)Google Scholar
3. Rebak, R. B., “Corrosion testing of nickel and titanium alloys for nuclear waste disposition,” Corrosion, 65, No. 4, pp. 252–271 (2009)10.5006/1.3319132Google Scholar
4. Rebak, R. B., “Environmental Degradation of Engineered Barrier Materials in Nuclear Waste Repositories,” Chapter 36 in Uhlig’s Corrosion Handbook , 3rd Edition by Winston Revie, R., John Wiley & Sons, 2011, pp. 503–516 10.1002/9780470872864.ch36Google Scholar
5. Rebak, R. B., “Factors Affecting the Crevice Corrosion Susceptibility of Alloy 22,” Corrosion/2005 , paper 05610 (NACE International, 2005: Houston, TX) Google Scholar
6. Carranza, R. M., “The Crevice Corrosion of Alloy 22 in the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository,” JOM, January 2008, pp. 58–65 10.1007/s11837-008-0009-zGoogle Scholar
7. Fix, D. V., Estill, J. C., Hust, G. A., Wong, L. L. and Rebak, R. B., “Environmentally Assisted Cracking Behavior of Nickel Alloys in Simulated Acidic and Alkaline Waters Using U-bend Specimens,” Corrosion/2004 , Paper 04549 (NACE International, 2004: Houston, TX)Google Scholar
8. King, K. J., Wong, L. L., Estill, J. C. and Rebak, R. B., “Slow Strain Rate Testing of Alloy 22 in Simulated Concentrated Ground Waters,” Corrosion/2004 , Paper 04548, (NACE International, 2004: Houston, TX)Google Scholar
9. Chiang, K. T., Dunn, D. S. and Cragnolino, G. A., “The Combined Effect of Bicarbonate and Chloride Ions on the Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility of Alloy 22,” Corrosion/2006 , Paper 06506, (NACE International, 2006: Houston, TX)Google Scholar
10. ASTM G5-94(2004), “Standard Reference Test Method for Making Potentiostatic and Potentiodynamic Anodic Polarization Measurements” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards , vol. 03.02 (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM Intl., 2004), pp. 53–64 Google Scholar