Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:18:31.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Sequence Distribution of Oxadiazole Moieties on Luminescence in a Poly(Phenylene-Vinylene) Derivative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Subramanian Vaidyanathan  and
Mary E. Galvin
Subramanian Vaidyanathan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
Mary E. Galvin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
Get access

Abstract

In order to realize the vast potential offered by semiconducting polymers in emissive display technologies, it is important to understand the structure-property relationships that govern their performance. This paper will focus on one such relationship in the most widely studied class of polymers viz. poly(phenylene-vinylene) (PPV) derivatives. We have synthesized oxadiazole containing PPV copolymers varying the composition and sequence distribution of the oxadiazole moiety in the chain. We find that a statistically random copolymer performs 50% better in EL efficiency than the corresponding alternating copolymer with the same chemical composition, and 3 times better than the homopolymer without any oxadiazole moieties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 725: Symposium P – Organic and Polymeric Materials and Devices-Optical, Electrical, and Optoelectronic Properties , 2002 , P2.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. RH, Friend, RW, Gymer, AB, Holmes, JH, Burroughes, RN, Marks, Taliani, C, DDC, Bradley, DA, Dos Santos, JL, Bredas, Logdlund, M, WR, Salaneck, Nature 397, 121 (1999)Google Scholar
2. Kraft, A, AC, Grimsdale, AB, Holmes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 402 (1998)Google Scholar
3. JL, Segura, Acta.. Polym. 49, 319 (1998)Google Scholar
4. Jiang, X, RA, Register, KA, Killeen, ME, Thompson, Pschenitzka, F, JC, Sturn, Chem. Mater. 12, 2542 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Lee, J, Zyung, T, RD, Miller, YH, Kim, SC, Jeoung, Kim, D, J. Mater. Chem. 10, 1547 (2000)Google Scholar
6. ZH, Peng, ZN, Bao, ME, Galvin, Chem. Mater. 10 (8), 2086 (1998)Google Scholar
7. ZH, Peng, ZN, Bao, ME, Galvin, Adv. Mater. 10 (9), 680 (1998)Google Scholar
8. Buchwald, E, Meier, M, Karg, S, Posch, P, HW, Schmidt, Strohriegl, P, Riess, W, Schwoerer, M, Adv. Mater. 7(10), 839 (1995)Google Scholar
9. XC, Li, Cacialli, F, Giles, M, Gruner, J, RH, Friend, AB, Holmes, SC, Moratti, TM, Yong, Adv. Mater. 7(11), 898 (1995)Google Scholar
10. AR, Brown, DDC, Bradley, JH, Burroughes, RH, Friend, NC, Greenham, PL, Burn, AB, Holmes, Kraft, A, Appl. Phys. Lett.. 61(23), 2793 (1992)Google Scholar
11. Menon, A, HP, Dong, ZI, Niazimbetova, LJ, Rothberg, ME, Galvin, Chem. Mater. (submitted 2002)Google Scholar