Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-28T02:05:07.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Secondary Phases Formation in the Leaching of UO2 Under Simulated Radiolytic Products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

P. Díaz-Arocas
Affiliation:
CIEMAT. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J. Quinoñes
Affiliation:
CIEMAT. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid, Spain.
C. Maffiotte
Affiliation:
CIEMAT. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J. Serrano
Affiliation:
CIEMAT. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J. Garcia
Affiliation:
CIEMAT. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J. R. Almazán
Affiliation:
CIEMAT. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J. Esteban
Affiliation:
CIEMAT. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Get access

Abstract

The leaching of the spent fuel matrix (UO2) is function of the radiolytic products formation. The effect of each radioiytic product on the leaching process is not totally understood. In the literature, the influence of H2O2 on the dissolution process is described from the qualitative point of view, and most of the studies were performed for pH values from 8 to 12. In this paper we report on the effect of the H2O2 in the leaching process of UO2 by dissolution experiments at various H2O2 concentrations. Also, it was tested the influence of S/V ratio (surface area exposed to the leaching media) on the UO2 leaching and secondary phases formation. It was identified the formation of secondary phases on the UO2 surface. Solid phases characterization was carried out by x-ray Photoelectron Spectrometry (XPS), x-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) techniques. By XPS studies the secondary phase formed corresponded to a U(VI) phase. By XRD analyses the solid was identified as studtite, UO4 - 4H2O, (card n0 16–206, [I]). A comparison of the U(VI) phases formed in spent fuel and UO, leaching experiments in various media has been carried out.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. JCPDS. International Centre for Diffraction Data. 1992.Google Scholar
2. Christensen, H.. Radiation Induced Dissolution of UO2 edited by Abrajano, T., and Johnson, L.H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 212, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) pp.213220.Google Scholar
3. Sunder, S., et al.. Oxidation of UQ2 Fuel by Radicals Formed During Radiolysis of Water edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 1990) pp. 457–64).Google Scholar
4. Maclntyre, N.S. et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18(3), 714 (1981)Google Scholar
5. Forsyth, R.S. et al.. Examination of Surface Deposit on a Irradiated PWR Fuel Specimen Subjected to Corrosion in Dei on i zed Water. SKB Technical Report 90–04, 1990, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
6. Forsyth, R.S., Werme, L.O., and Bruno, J., J. Nucl. Mater. 138, 1 (1986)Google Scholar
7. Stroes-Gascoyne, S. et al. Dissolution of Used Candu Fuel at Various Temperatures and Redox Conditions edited by Werme, L.O. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50 (1986) pp. 317326.Google Scholar
8. Bates, J.K., et al, Identification of Secondary Phases Formed During Unsaturated Reaction of UQ2 with EJ-13 Water edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 1990) pp. 499506.Google Scholar
9. Torrero, M.E., et al. presented at the Migration 93 meeting, South Caroline, 1993 (to be published in Radiochim. Acta)Google Scholar
10. Walenta, K., American Mineral. 59, 166 (1974).Google Scholar
11. Christ, C.L. and Clark, J.R.. The American Minera. 45, 1026 (1960)Google Scholar