Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:09.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Phase Transformations on Hardness of Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

B. A. Galanov ,
O. N. Grigor'ev  and
Y. G. Gogotsi
B. A. Galanov
Affiliation:
Institute for Problems of Materials Science, Kiev, Ukraine
O. N. Grigor'ev
Affiliation:
Institute for Problems of Materials Science, Kiev, Ukraine
Y. G. Gogotsi
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chicago, IL [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Models that describe hardness of materials do not account for stress-induced phase transformations that occur under sharp indenters. However, experimental work shows that some materials can be transformed under the indenter into new, high-pressure phases with properties that differ significantly from those of the pristine material. In particular, semiconductors (Si, Ge and other) experience Herzfeld-Mott transition (metallization). Significant volume changes can accompany these transformations. In the present paper, Tanaka's model [1] has been modified to account for reversible phase transformations under contact loading.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 481: Symposium P – Science and Technology of Semiconductor Surface Preparation , 1997 , 249
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tanaka, K., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 1501–1508 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Gridneva, I. V., Milman, Yu.V. and Trefilov, V. I., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 14, 177–182 (1972).Google Scholar
3. Cahn, R. W., Nature, 357, 645–646 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Gilman, J. J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 535–538 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Callahan, D. L. and Morris, J. C., J. Mater. Res., 7 1614–1617 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Pharr, G. M., Oliver, W. C., and Clarke, D. R., Scripta Metall. 23, 1949 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Gogotsi, Y. G., Kailer, A., Nickel, K. G., Materials Research Innovations, 1 (1) 3–9 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Kailer, A., Gogotsi, Y. G., Nickel, K. G., J. Appl. Phys. 81 (7), 3057–3063 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Lawn, B., Wilshaw, R., J. Mater. Sci. 10, 1049–1081 (1975).Google Scholar
10. McHolm, I. J., Ceramic Hardness (Plenum Press, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
11. Johnson, K.L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, England, 1985).Google Scholar
12. Hill, R., The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity (Oxford University Press, London, 1959).Google Scholar