Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:32:43.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defect Physics of CuInSe2 for Photovoltaic Applications Using Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Theanne Schiros
Affiliation:
Hunter College of the City University of New York, NY, NY 10021, USA
Scott Calvin
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington D.C. 20375, USA
P.E. Stallworth
Affiliation:
Hunter College of the City University of New York, NY, NY 10021, USA
Faisal Alamgir
Affiliation:
Hunter College of the City University of New York, NY, NY 10021, USA
J.-F. Guillemoles
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Electrochimie et de Chimie Analytique ENSCP, 75231 Paris, FRANCE
S.G. Greenbaum
Affiliation:
Hunter College of the City University of New York, NY, NY 10021, USA
M.L. den Boer
Affiliation:
Hunter College of the City University of New York, NY, NY 10021, USA
Get access

Abstract

Native point defects in undoped samples of CuInSe2 (CIS) have been identified by a multiple-edge refinement of the extended x-ray absorption fine structure of the copper, indium and selenium absorption edges. Ab initio theoretical models for the pure compound and for various defect structures were constructed and carrier-type statistics were predicted by simultaneously fitting multiple absorption sites to these models. As expected, a model of our measurements based on pure compounds with no defects does not yield a good fit to the data. We find that a best fit requires a significant population of defects. Preliminary quantitative analysis suggests a 15 % vacancy in Cu, a 2-12% population of Cu-Se anti-sites and 15% In-Se anti-sites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. , Zhang, Wei, Su-Huai, and Zunger, Alex. Phys. Rev. B. 57, 16 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Guillemoles, J.-F.. Thin Solid Films 361-362 (2000) 338345.Google Scholar
3. Rincon, C. and Marquez, R.. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 60, 18651873 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Mullan, C.A., Kiely, C.J., Casey, S.M., Imanieh, M., Yahkushev, M.V., Tomlinson, R.D. J. Cryst. Growth, 171, 415424 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Aubin, V., Binet, L., Guillemoles, J.F.. Thin Solid Films (2003), in press.Google Scholar
6. Stallworth, P.E., Caillerie, J.-B. d'Espinose de la, Maquet, J., Babonneau, F., Guillemoles, J.-F., Powalla, M., Lyakovitskaya, V., Yakushev, M. and Tomlinson, B.. Thin Film Solids 387 (2001) 235238.Google Scholar
7. Niki, S., Suzuki, R., Ishibashi, S., Ohdaira, T., Fons, P.J., Yamada, A., Oyanagi, H., Wada, T., Kimura, R., Nakada, T.. Thin Solid Films 387 (2001) 129134.Google Scholar
8. Hasan, S.M. Firoz, Quadir, L., Begum, Kh.S., Subhan, M.A., Mannan, Kh.M.. Vacuum 55 (1999) 1721. 12.Google Scholar
9. Ka, O., Alves, H., Dirnstorfer, I., Christmann, T., Meyer, B.K.. Thin Solid Films 361-362 (2000) 263267.Google Scholar
10. Ankudinov, A.L., Ravel, B., Rehr, J.J., and Conradson, S.D.. Phys. Rev B 58, 7565 (1998).Google Scholar
11. Newville, Matthew. Fundamentals of XAFS. Consortium for Advanced Radiation Sources, University of Chicago (2002).Google Scholar
12. Calvin, S., Carpenter, E.E., Ravel, B., and Harris, V.G.. Phys. Rev. B 66, 224405 (2002).Google Scholar